Search This Blog

Thursday, August 17, 2017

What does removing confederate statues do anyway?

  1. Boards
  2. Current Events
  3. What does removing confederate statues do anyway ?
I mean people just aren't going to change their views just because some statue was taken away.

I mean it's just something made out of rock or marble or something.

I don't let some statue tell me what to do.

So if people want to get along then why not have a big social gathering with all these groups and everyone can express their woes about each other and maybe everyone can come to some mutual agreement or something.
The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT
[Government Destabilizing Branch]
If you think that the statue being there is so innocuous then why balk at it being removed? It means nothing, right?
You've fought the strongest, the second strongest, the fourth strongest, and the weakest master! Now you see the true advantage of being third strongest master!
Butterfiles 1 day ago#3
because they represent a group of traitors who fought for the right to own other human beings
PrettyBoyFloyd posted...
I mean people just aren't going to change their views just because some statue was taken away.

I mean it's just something made out of rock or marble or something.

I don't let some statue tell me what to do.

So if people want to get along then why not have a big social gathering with all these groups and everyone can express their woes about each other and maybe everyone can come to some mutual agreement or something.

If the statue doesn't do anything, then you shouldn't care if it gets removed or not.
Vindris_SNH 1 day ago#5
Prevents racism.
glitteringfairy: Just build the damn wall
ThyCorndog: and how exactly will that stop the mexican space program from orbital dropping illegal immigrants?
Edible 1 day ago#6
You're cool with a heroic statue of Osama bin Laden in your hometown then? Think your neighbors will be?
We are on a voyage to the truth. The light shines on the earth...
What are you thinking about so deeply in the face of fact?
voldothegr8 1 day ago#7
Didn't you hear, if all the statues go away racism will too!
Oda break tracker 2017- 6 (3) 
Super Mario Maker Profile: 1237-0000-0073-02FE
PrettyBoyFloyd 1 day ago#8
If the statue doesn't do anything, then you shouldn't care if it gets removed or not.

I don't.

Haven't seen one in my life aside a Cherokee face some dude carved out of a tree back in the mid 1980's.

I just want to see what everyone else thinks.
The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT
[Government Destabilizing Branch]
voldothegr8 posted...
Didn't you hear, if all the statues go away racism will too!

How do you eat a whole elephant?
PrettyBoyFloyd 1 day ago#10
Didn't you hear, if all the statues go away racism will too!

This is kind of what I'm trying to say.

People are like if the statues are gone then racism will be gone too.

Like instead of trying to have better communication and understanding with each other.

Trying to 1UP each other just isn't going to work.
The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT
[Government Destabilizing Branch]
Foppe 1 day ago#11
Because if they are gone, they can start forgetting why they existed in the first place, whitewashing history into a happier place.
GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC
eston 1 day ago#12
It means we as a nation stop celebrating the accomplishments of traitors. Some individuals will continue to treat these men as heroes. The United States as a country will not.
eston posted...
Some individuals will continue to treat these men as heroes. The United States as a country will not.

Wasn't that already the case?
Oda break tracker 2017- 6 (3) 
Super Mario Maker Profile: 1237-0000-0073-02FE
Butterfiles posted...
because they represent a group of traitors who fought for the right to own other human beings


Pretty much. We can still have nuanced discussions while hoping for the removal of statues that honor the confederacy.
eston 1 day ago#15
voldothegr8 posted...
eston posted...
Some individuals will continue to treat these men as heroes. The United States as a country will not.

Wasn't that already the case?

Not while those statues are sitting on public land
It stops the constant metaphorical spitting in the eyes of black folk and helps to un-normalize the veneration of those people.
There's a reason those statues were erected during Jim Crow.
"Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali
(edited 1 day ago)reportquote
I support someone's idea of putting them in museums the other day, but to have them as a US monument is pretty dumb at this point.
Mains: Xiaoyu/Zafina (Tekken)-Dhalsim (SF)-Jax (MK)
Luong/Yamazaki/Joe (KoF)
Foppe posted...
Because if they are gone, they can start forgetting why they existed in the first place, whitewashing history into a happier place.

Putting them up in the first place was done in order to whitewash the reasons for the civil war and attribute the conflict to reasons that weren't true at the time but merely made up after the fact. And they were also put up as a symbol of racial intimidation in order to remind the now freed slaves of their place in the post-civil war south while others were erected during the height of the Civil Rights movement for the very same reason. But you already know this cause you've been told it in previous topics. So you're either you're trolling or merely consider paint chips a delicacy.
You've fought the strongest, the second strongest, the fourth strongest, and the weakest master! Now you see the true advantage of being third strongest master!
The government reminds all yous that the confederate statues will never threaten to stab you and, in fact, cannot speak. In the event that the confederate statues do speak, the government urges you to disregard its advice.
''25 posts in and no one has addressed the orignal question. Also, I'm continuing that streak :P'' ~ Lord_Zenki
Join the unknown: http://goo.gl/S75cmn
Foppe posted...
Because if they are gone, they can start forgetting why they existed in the first place, whitewashing history into a happier place.



https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0qTabSHhvZI/hqdefault.jpg
Will_Vill 1 day ago#21
It doesn't stop racism but it does stop honoring those individuals in publicly funded areas so it's a start in the right direction. Why should we have monuments of traitors and racists on public property?
Caution999 1 day ago#22
Vindris_SNH posted...
Prevents racism.


You've heard it here first folks! An inanimate object can prevent racism!
"Impossible is just a word to let people feel good about themselves when they quit." - Vyse, Skies of Arcadia
Nomadic View  tear this gooby up1 day ago#23
They've been charged with vandalism. They'll be required to pay restitution for the damages they caused.

I guess they like the statue so much they thought the town should get a brand new one.
{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>
It's kind of dumb. Really I would just add a Union hero statue to go with the confederate statue. Piss them off a different way.
when you stub your toes it's the SJWs fualt.
It doesn't do anything now but it sure as hell will protect the future gens from having to learn about this bulls***
.
CableZL 1 day ago#26
PrettyBoyFloyd 1 day ago#27
yoshirulezz1 posted...
It doesn't do anything now but it sure as hell will protect the future gens from having to learn about this bulls***

So they are also going to stop teaching about the American Civil War in school ?
The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT
[Government Destabilizing Branch]
It starts riots.
My name is Harpuia, one of the four Guardians of Master X and General of the Strong Air Battalion, The Rekku Army.
Foppe 1 day ago#29
3rd_Best_Master posted...
Foppe posted...
Because if they are gone, they can start forgetting why they existed in the first place, whitewashing history into a happier place.

Putting them up in the first place was done in order to whitewash the reasons for the civil war and attribute the conflict to reasons that weren't true at the time but merely made up after the fact. And they were also put up as a symbol of racial intimidation in order to remind the now freed slaves of their place in the post-civil war south while others were erected during the height of the Civil Rights movement for the very same reason. But you already know this cause you've been told it in previous topics. So you're either you're trolling or merely consider paint chips a delicacy.


And as I said in the other topic, which you know, is that they want to whitewash the fact that they tried to whitewash history.
Starting to censor parts of your history that you dislike will just start a snowball effect where more and more gets censored. So what will the next step be?
Forgetting that we had Founding Fathers that had slaves, that lived on slaves and had no intention to give them freedom? That we had civil rights movements less than a lifetime ago? That we had a highranked Nazi helping us win the space race?
GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC
Foppe 1 day ago#30
PrettyBoyFloyd posted...
yoshirulezz1 posted...
It doesn't do anything now but it sure as hell will protect the future gens from having to learn about this bulls***

So they are also going to stop teaching about the American Civil War in school ?


It does sound much better if we skip that part, making it sound like we have always had a strong union since day one, right?
GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC
Foppe posted...
3rd_Best_Master posted...
Foppe posted...
Because if they are gone, they can start forgetting why they existed in the first place, whitewashing history into a happier place.

Putting them up in the first place was done in order to whitewash the reasons for the civil war and attribute the conflict to reasons that weren't true at the time but merely made up after the fact. And they were also put up as a symbol of racial intimidation in order to remind the now freed slaves of their place in the post-civil war south while others were erected during the height of the Civil Rights movement for the very same reason. But you already know this cause you've been told it in previous topics. So you're either you're trolling or merely consider paint chips a delicacy.


And as I said in the other topic, which you know, is that they want to whitewash the fact that they tried to whitewash history.
Starting to censor parts of your history that you dislike will just start a snowball effect where more and more gets censored. So what will the next step be?
Forgetting that we had Founding Fathers that had slaves, that lived on slaves and had no intention to give them freedom? That we had civil rights movements less than a lifetime ago? That we had a highranked Nazi helping us win the space race?

Slippery slope is a fallacy for a reason and maintaining statues that were only erected as a means of racial intimidation is also downright idiotic. Our society no longer believes in the merits of enabling a silent minority that means to oppress black people from the shadows and I don't understand why you'd argue in favor of that.
You've fought the strongest, the second strongest, the fourth strongest, and the weakest master! Now you see the true advantage of being third strongest master!
nesplayer 1 day ago#32
It just gives you your 15 minutes of fame
This sig won't be changed until a certain pitcher with an alliterative name either gets DFAed, somehow traded because of a stupid gm, or blows out his elbow
The statues give people the impression there was any honor in the Confederate cause.
Guns; freedom you can hold in your hand.
Sampson, Terrordactyl
Asherlee10 1 day ago#34
mustachedmystic posted...
The statues give people the impression there was any honor in the Confederate cause.


The impression?
"Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
do you think black people like seeing statues honoring people who fought in the name of keeping them as property? :u
copout 1 day ago#36
Because their shouldn't be a statue of the first Grand Wizard of the KKK on the busiest street in Memphis.
11 year Memphis Grizzlies season ticket holder.
Little if anything. People blaming the statues for systemic racism will wake up and find themselves in the same s***ty life they had last month and will move on to something else to blame. 

Of course since this only became this big fired up "must deal with now" issue in the last week, I'd say it's a fun bandwagon for people to jump on just to piss of Trump supporters whereas a week ago these were just things pigeons pooped on.
lightwarrior78 posted...
Of course since this only became this big fired up "must deal with now" issue in the last week,


This has been simmering for decades.
Guns; freedom you can hold in your hand.
Sampson, Terrordactyl
Asherlee10 1 day ago#39
Why do some of you think that the removing the statues have to accomplish anything besides not glorifying/celebrating the acts of the Confederacy?
"Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
Foppe 15 hours ago#40
3rd_Best_Master posted...
Foppe posted...
3rd_Best_Master posted...
Foppe posted...
Because if they are gone, they can start forgetting why they existed in the first place, whitewashing history into a happier place.

Putting them up in the first place was done in order to whitewash the reasons for the civil war and attribute the conflict to reasons that weren't true at the time but merely made up after the fact. And they were also put up as a symbol of racial intimidation in order to remind the now freed slaves of their place in the post-civil war south while others were erected during the height of the Civil Rights movement for the very same reason. But you already know this cause you've been told it in previous topics. So you're either you're trolling or merely consider paint chips a delicacy.


And as I said in the other topic, which you know, is that they want to whitewash the fact that they tried to whitewash history.
Starting to censor parts of your history that you dislike will just start a snowball effect where more and more gets censored. So what will the next step be?
Forgetting that we had Founding Fathers that had slaves, that lived on slaves and had no intention to give them freedom? That we had civil rights movements less than a lifetime ago? That we had a highranked Nazi helping us win the space race?

Slippery slope is a fallacy for a reason and maintaining statues that were only erected as a means of racial intimidation is also downright idiotic. Our society no longer believes in the merits of enabling a silent minority that means to oppress black people from the shadows and I don't understand why you'd argue in favor of that.


Censorship.
SJWs trying to make us look better than what we are.
Those who do not remember their past are condemned to repeat their mistakes.
GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC
Dash_Harber 15 hours ago#41
If you earnestly believe that symbols have no effect on people, you are the sort of naive I wish I could go back to.

The fact is, statues placed in places of honor are there to represent what a culture or people see themselves as or strive to be. It would reason that when those statues begin to represent something that no one wants to be anymore, they should be moved to a museum and make way for new ideas.
wah_wah_wah 15 hours ago#42
Foppe posted...
3rd_Best_Master posted...
Foppe posted...
3rd_Best_Master posted...
Foppe posted...
Because if they are gone, they can start forgetting why they existed in the first place, whitewashing history into a happier place.

Putting them up in the first place was done in order to whitewash the reasons for the civil war and attribute the conflict to reasons that weren't true at the time but merely made up after the fact. And they were also put up as a symbol of racial intimidation in order to remind the now freed slaves of their place in the post-civil war south while others were erected during the height of the Civil Rights movement for the very same reason. But you already know this cause you've been told it in previous topics. So you're either you're trolling or merely consider paint chips a delicacy.


And as I said in the other topic, which you know, is that they want to whitewash the fact that they tried to whitewash history.
Starting to censor parts of your history that you dislike will just start a snowball effect where more and more gets censored. So what will the next step be?
Forgetting that we had Founding Fathers that had slaves, that lived on slaves and had no intention to give them freedom? That we had civil rights movements less than a lifetime ago? That we had a highranked Nazi helping us win the space race?

Slippery slope is a fallacy for a reason and maintaining statues that were only erected as a means of racial intimidation is also downright idiotic. Our society no longer believes in the merits of enabling a silent minority that means to oppress black people from the shadows and I don't understand why you'd argue in favor of that.


Censorship.
SJWs trying to make us look better than what we are.
Those who do not remember their past are condemned to repeat their mistakes.

Would you support putting a statue of bin Laden on ground zero? I mean, you don't want to forget the past, do you?
Foppe 12 hours ago#43
If people thought of the Souths as we think of Bin Laden, then those statues would have never existed in the first place.
GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC
Bok_Choi 12 hours ago#44
BECAUSE TO YOU IT'S JUST A STATUE OF A GUY

To black people it's a statue of a guy that wanted people that look like you to either be enslaved or face death

Gee I wonder why
Bok_Choi 12 hours ago#45
Foppe posted...
If people thought of the Souths as we think of Bin Laden, then those statues would have never existed in the first place.

American Civil War is a weird time really

I don't think either side's people really lost sight of the other side being their fellow countrymen, their brothers

There's still a burgeoning respect for the military minds of the south, few of whom chose state loyalty over personal morals
It was a different time, and things like state identity and nationalism are vestiges in this global economy, so it's not hard to see why young and new adults are struggling to see
_Goggalor_ 12 hours ago#46
Bok_Choi posted...
BECAUSE TO YOU IT'S JUST A STATUE OF A GUY

To black people it's a statue of a guy that wanted people that look like you to either be enslaved or face death

Gee I wonder why


Who says they have the authority to pull the statue down though? That's up to the city and whoever made the statue.
Second-hand Skin available now: https://www.createspace.com/7262713
Tales From the Bleak: https://www.createspace.com/7396531
Kineth  BLM sympathizer12 hours ago#47
_Goggalor_ posted...
Bok_Choi posted...
BECAUSE TO YOU IT'S JUST A STATUE OF A GUY

To black people it's a statue of a guy that wanted people that look like you to either be enslaved or face death

Gee I wonder why


Who says they have the authority to pull the statue down though?


That's not the argument being made.
If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply.
Twin3Turbo 12 hours ago#48
Kineth posted...
_Goggalor_ posted...
Bok_Choi posted...
BECAUSE TO YOU IT'S JUST A STATUE OF A GUY

To black people it's a statue of a guy that wanted people that look like you to either be enslaved or face death

Gee I wonder why


Who says they have the authority to pull the statue down though?


That's not the argument being made.
gamepimp12 12 hours ago#49
_Goggalor_ posted...
Bok_Choi posted...
BECAUSE TO YOU IT'S JUST A STATUE OF A GUY

To black people it's a statue of a guy that wanted people that look like you to either be enslaved or face death

Gee I wonder why


Who says they have the authority to pull the statue down though? That's up to the city and whoever made the statue.


They don't, but let's not act like bureaucracy is slow.

Like for example had people wanted for that statue in NC to go down (which the governor was already planning) 

The first would of had to repeal a law the last governor did, which in a op senate would take forever, then had to research how to take me down the cost and where to put them.

They wouldn't be down till 2019 at the earliest
we rich now but used to be slaves,we pushing whips now we used to be whipped,rockin chains when we used to be in 'em
wah_wah_wah 11 hours ago#50
Foppe posted...
If people thought of the Souths as we think of Bin Laden, then those statues would have never existed in the first place.

People did think of Robert E Lee like we think of Bin Laden. Black people. When those statues went up, they had no rights and were disenfranchised freedmen who could do nothing to stop it. That's why this whole argument that "we need to preserve the history" is faulty. By preserving the statues you're not preserving the history. You're remembering it as it didn't happen.
  1. Boards
  2. Current Events 
  3. What does removing confederate statues do anyway ?

No comments:

Post a Comment