Search This Blog

Thursday, August 17, 2017

PETA steals little girl's chihuahua, euthanizes it

  1. Boards
  2. Current Events
  3. PETA steals little girl's chihuahua, euthanizes it
Coffeebeanz 4 hours ago#1
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/17/peta-pays-family-50000-taking-euthanising-pet-chihuahua/


The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta)has apologised and paid a family almost $49,000 after taking and euthanising a little girl's pet chihuahua.

Two people affiliated with the group travelled to the mobile home park because they said they had been asked for help picking up wild dogs and feral cats.

They removed an unattended chihuahua calledMaya, which was a Christmas present to nine-year-old Cynthia Zarate.

Her father, Wilber Zarate, from Virginia, sued the company after it picked up his daughter's dog from the mobile home park and putting it down before a five day grace period was up.


Now that's what I call ethical treatment.
Physician [Internal Medicine]
mario2000 4 hours ago#2
PETA is "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals" in the same way that North Korea is a "Democratic People's Republic".
Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt
Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash
leverageblargh 4 hours ago#3
Mr_Zarate_II
Mernardi 4 hours ago#4
I hate PETA. And stories like this show me why.
Chaos is a ladder
ThePredominate 4 hours ago#5
I would find who did it and perhaps have to serve a sentence afterwards.
Keep your face to the Sunshine,
and you will not see the Shadows.
Monkhood 4 hours ago#6
Why does PETA still exist
I won't have to live in this false, sinful, lying, dying body.
Coffeebeanz 4 hours ago#7
Maya was put down the same day she was caught, which was a violation of a state law that requires a five-day grace period.

Peta was fined $500 for the violation, and had to pay more after Mr Zarate took further action.

He claimed that the group operates under a policy of putting down healthy animals because it“considers pet ownership to be a form of involuntary bondage”.

Peta denied this, claiming the 2014 incident was a "terrible accident".


Hot damn they didnt even give it a day
Physician [Internal Medicine]
BootyGif 4 hours ago#8
Coffeebeanz posted...
has apologised and paid a family almost $49,000 a

seems fair
Zeeak4444 4 hours ago#9
Monkhood posted...
Why does PETA still exist


This. f*** them and those who support them.
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
Funkydog  question him ALWAYS4 hours ago#10
Peta are just plain awful and should go f*** themselves.
BootyGif 4 hours ago#11
Coffeebeanz posted...
He claimed that the group operates under a policy of putting down healthy animals because it“considers pet ownership to be a form of involuntary bondage”.

"we dont want you owning this beautiful free creature so we're gonna kill it"

...
How'd they get it, was it in their yard still or roaming without a collar? If it was in the families yard, they should face criminal charges.
"Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali
cjsdowg 4 hours ago#13
These people should have been thrown in jail like Mike Vick.
Bender: Well, everybody, I just saved a turtle. What have you done with your lives?
Zeeak4444 4 hours ago#14
BootyGif posted...
Coffeebeanz posted...
has apologised and paid a family almost $49,000 a

seems fair


f*** that. Money can't replace things like that.

That's as fair as giving someone $100,000 for killing their son and saying it seems fair.
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
ProfDE 4 hours ago#15
But yet if it were a human life it would be hundreds of thousands of dollars. I consider pets part of the family.
(edited 4 hours ago)reportquote
MegaTech 4 hours ago#16
The dog was later...
"I'm low-key, like a locksmith workin' on both knees." 
https://i.imgur.com/c8xCRi7.png - CoolbeansAvi
Mernardi 4 hours ago#17
Zeeak4444 posted...
BootyGif posted...
Coffeebeanz posted...
has apologised and paid a family almost $49,000 a

seems fair


f*** that. Money can't replace things like that.

That's as fair as giving someone $100,000 for killing their son and saying it seems fair.

This. 

"Fair" would be shutting PETA down for good and every last cent they had goes towards families they've wronged and humane societies.
Chaos is a ladder
Zeeak4444 posted...
f*** that. Money can't replace things like that.


Nothing can in these scenarios so what's your "fair" reparations eternal bondage? And it's a f***ing dog, they'll get over it. $50k is fair. More than fair. When she graduates college free of debt (assuming the parents don't blow it) she'll not be thinking about the dog she had.
"Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Mernardi 4 hours ago#19
Anarchy_Juiblex posted...
Zeeak4444 posted...
f*** that. Money can't replace things like that.


Nothing can in these scenarios so what's your "fair" reparations eternal bondage? And it's a f***ing dog, they'll get over it. $50k is fair. More than fair. When she graduates college free of debt (assuming the parents don't blow it) she'll not be thinking about the dog she had.

f*** off. They had their dog stolen and killed. That's f***ed up no matter how you try to justify that "it was just a dog".
Chaos is a ladder
Coffeebeanz 4 hours ago#20
Anarchy_Juiblex posted...
Zeeak4444 posted...
f*** that. Money can't replace things like that.


Nothing can in these scenarios so what's your "fair" reparations eternal bondage? And it's a f***ing dog, they'll get over it. $50k is fair. More than fair. When she graduates college free of debt (assuming the parents don't blow it) she'll not be thinking about the dog she had.


Pretty sure deliberately killing someone's dog could qualify as animal cruelty.
Physician [Internal Medicine]
anth0ny 4 hours ago#21
Zeeak4444 posted...
BootyGif posted...
Coffeebeanz posted...
has apologised and paid a family almost $49,000 a

seems fair


f*** that. Money can't replace things like that.

That's as fair as giving someone $100,000 for killing their son and saying it seems fair.

like... 10 million at least

now imagine their son was a CEman
moo
(edited 4 hours ago)reportquote
Mernardi posted...
Anarchy_Juiblex posted...
Zeeak4444 posted...
f*** that. Money can't replace things like that.


Nothing can in these scenarios so what's your "fair" reparations eternal bondage? And it's a f***ing dog, they'll get over it. $50k is fair. More than fair. When she graduates college free of debt (assuming the parents don't blow it) she'll not be thinking about the dog she had.

f*** off. They had their dog stolen and killed. That's f***ed up no matter how you try to justify that "it was just a dog".

Then it's Malicious Destruction of Property, which is felony in Virginia if the family paid more than $1000 for the dog.
eston 4 hours ago#23
Coffeebeanz 4 hours ago#24
Reminds me of when Greenpeace permanently damaged the Nazca lines

https://news.vice.com/article/drone-footage-shows-extent-of-damage-from-greenpeace-stunt-at-nazca-lines
Physician [Internal Medicine]
Zeeak4444 4 hours ago#25
Anarchy_Juiblex posted...
Zeeak4444 posted...
f*** that. Money can't replace things like that.


Nothing can in these scenarios so what's your "fair" reparations eternal bondage? And it's a f***ing dog, they'll get over it. $50k is fair. More than fair. When she graduates college free of debt (assuming the parents don't blow it) she'll not be thinking about the dog she had.


It's just your son. f*** it, you'll get over it.

When you use the 100k for a vacation or to put the little sibling through school they won't be thinking about the boy they used to have.

Subjectivity is a b**** isn't it?
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
(edited 4 hours ago)reportquote
SK8T3R215 4 hours ago#26
Not a bad settlement for a dog.

Also humans are typically valued at millions of dollars for wrongful death.
New York Knicks, New York Jets, New York Yankees.
(edited 4 hours ago)reportquote
Zeeak4444 4 hours ago#27
Questionmarktarius posted...
Mernardi posted...
Anarchy_Juiblex posted...
Zeeak4444 posted...
f*** that. Money can't replace things like that.


Nothing can in these scenarios so what's your "fair" reparations eternal bondage? And it's a f***ing dog, they'll get over it. $50k is fair. More than fair. When she graduates college free of debt (assuming the parents don't blow it) she'll not be thinking about the dog she had.

f*** off. They had their dog stolen and killed. That's f***ed up no matter how you try to justify that "it was just a dog".

Then it's Malicious Destruction of Property, which is felony in Virginia if the family paid more than $1000 for the dog.


I don't think anyone here's arguing about the literal law. They're arguing about ethics and morals within the current definition of the law.
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
RebelElite791 4 hours ago#28
PETA sucks. I don't personally know a single vegan or animal lover who supports them.
GOATTHlEF 4 hours ago#29
f*** Peta.
CE Unleashed! The first of two gamefaqs based magic sets.
https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/575966-magic-madness/75611395
smoliske 4 hours ago#30
leverageblargh posted...
Mr_Zarate_II
eston 4 hours ago#31
I've had many dogs, and I also have a son, and I can't take anyone seriously who puts those two things on the same level
PETA is evil
Bok_Choi 4 hours ago#33
People Eating Tasty Animals
Zeeak4444 4 hours ago#34
eston posted...
I've had many dogs, and I also have a son, and I can't take anyone seriously who puts those two things on the same level


That's fine though you don't have to. 

Not everyone's gonna feel that way.

But you're also conviently forgetting about all the people who want children and can't have them for one reason or another and those who don't like/want children but still want a companion, best friend, or "fur-baby".

You might not be able to take them seriously but theres plenty who feel the same about you and would consider you to be selfish and pretentious for thinking everyone has the same opportunities available to them as you do.
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
(edited 4 hours ago)reportquote
Bok_Choi 4 hours ago#35
Zeeak4444 posted...
You might not be able to take them seriously but theres plenty who feel the same about you and would consider you to be selfish and pretentious for thinking everyone has the same opportunities available to them as you do.

I don't think many people who can't have kids are actually satisfied with having a pet as a kid
Zeeak4444 4 hours ago#36
Bok_Choi posted...
Zeeak4444 posted...
You might not be able to take them seriously but theres plenty who feel the same about you and would consider you to be selfish and pretentious for thinking everyone has the same opportunities available to them as you do.

I don't think many people who can't have kids are actually satisfied with having a pet as a kid


You'd be surprised, gotta settle for something.

But ya in this case it be more for the ones that want pets over children.
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
Callixtus 4 hours ago#37
Imagine if white abolitionists thought this in the 1800s
KhanofKhans, KhanJohnson, Saloonist, Basileos
Bok_Choi 4 hours ago#38
Zeeak4444 posted...
Bok_Choi posted...
Zeeak4444 posted...
You might not be able to take them seriously but theres plenty who feel the same about you and would consider you to be selfish and pretentious for thinking everyone has the same opportunities available to them as you do.

I don't think many people who can't have kids are actually satisfied with having a pet as a kid


You'd be surprised, gotta settle for something.

But ya in this case it be more for the ones that want pets over children.

True

but in the end trying to equate a pet with a living human child is stupid and most anyone who does so deserves to be laughed at tbh
eston 4 hours ago#39
Zeeak4444 posted...
eston posted...
I've had many dogs, and I also have a son, and I can't take anyone seriously who puts those two things on the same level


That's fine though you don't have to. 

Not everyone's gonna feel that way.

But you're also conviently forgetting about all the people who want children and can't have them for one reason or another and those who don't like/want children but still want a companion, best friend, or "fur-baby".

You might not be able to take them seriously but theres plenty who feel the same about you and would consider you to be selfish and pretentious for thinking everyone has the same opportunities available to them as you do.

Obviously there are exceptions like what you brought up, but in general if someone talks about their pets being like their children it tells me that they have no idea what it's like to have children
Zeeak4444 4 hours ago#40
Bok_Choi posted...
Zeeak4444 posted...
Bok_Choi posted...
Zeeak4444 posted...
You might not be able to take them seriously but theres plenty who feel the same about you and would consider you to be selfish and pretentious for thinking everyone has the same opportunities available to them as you do.

I don't think many people who can't have kids are actually satisfied with having a pet as a kid


You'd be surprised, gotta settle for something.

But ya in this case it be more for the ones that want pets over children.

True

but in the end trying to equate a pet with a living human child is stupid and most anyone who does so deserves to be laughed at tbh


I mean that's fair I'm not gonna complain but it's still very subjective.
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
Zeeak4444 posted...
It's just your son . . .


You need to step away from your keyboard kid.

Trust me when I say this, the family, a lot happier that it was the dog than their daughter being killed.
"Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Zeeak4444 4 hours ago#42
eston posted...
Zeeak4444 posted...
eston posted...
I've had many dogs, and I also have a son, and I can't take anyone seriously who puts those two things on the same level


That's fine though you don't have to. 

Not everyone's gonna feel that way.

But you're also conviently forgetting about all the people who want children and can't have them for one reason or another and those who don't like/want children but still want a companion, best friend, or "fur-baby".

You might not be able to take them seriously but theres plenty who feel the same about you and would consider you to be selfish and pretentious for thinking everyone has the same opportunities available to them as you do.

Obviously there are exceptions like what you brought up, but in general if someone talks about their pets being like their children it tells me that they have no idea what it's like to have children


Ya that's a really fair point.
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
Zeeak4444 4 hours ago#43
Anarchy_Juiblex posted...
Zeeak4444 posted...
It's just your son . . .


You need to step away from your keyboard kid.

Trust me when I say this, the family, a lot happier that it was the dog than their daughter being killed.


Lol the go to "kid" response. Super solid response.
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
"wahhh anni mals, I cant tell difference between kid and pet, they all family"

eston already wrecked you without even trying. Even f***ing bring up one's child in this topic is an intellectual dead end. You invalidated all the other idiocy you spewed the moment you said that.
"Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Bok_Choi 3 hours ago#45
Anarchy_Juiblex posted...
eston already wrecked you without even trying

man you really need to tone down your aggressive behavior
this is just a message board

calm the f*** down lmfao
Typhon 3 hours ago#46
Euthanize PETA.
Zeeak4444 3 hours ago#47
Anarchy_Juiblex posted...
"wahhh anni mals, I cant tell difference between kid and pet, they all family"

eston already wrecked you without even trying. Even f***ing bring up one's child in this topic is an intellectual dead end. You invalidated all the other idiocy you spewed the moment you said that.


Subjectivitys a b****, but apparently you're not aware of what that word means.

Do some research, "kid".
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
Sir Will 3 hours ago#48
Coffeebeanz posted...
Peta was fined $500 for the violation

...that's it? Disgusting.
River Song: Well, I was off to this gay gypsy bar mitzvah for the disabled when I thought 'Gosh, the Third Reich's a bit rubbish, I think i'll kill the Fuhrer'
Darkman124 3 hours ago#49
RebelElite791 posted...
PETA sucks. I don't personally know a single vegan or animal lover who supports them.


ditto
And when the hourglass has run out, eternity asks you about only one thing: whether you have lived in despair or not.
(edited 3 hours ago)reportquote
Sir Will posted...
Coffeebeanz posted...
Peta was fined $500 for the violation

...that's it? Disgusting.

Animals are considered property in the eye's of the law.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself --- and you are the easiest person to fool.
  1. Boards
  2. Current Events 
  3. PETA steals little girl's chihuahua, euthanizes it
    1. Boards
    2. Current Events
    3. PETA steals little girl's chihuahua, euthanizes it
    NadYobWoc 5 hours ago#51
    It's sad how little value most humans place on non-human life.
    Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene
    Bok_Choi 5 hours ago#52
    NadYobWoc posted...
    It's sad how little value most humans place on non-human life.

    LOL what

    People literally care more about dogs than black people in the USA and you say this?
    lmfao
    NadYobWoc posted...
    little value


    $50k is not little value, that's more than a years worth for work for most people. Also you could breed a boat load of chihuahuas for that about of time.
    "Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali
    Chaosmaster00 5 hours ago#54
    PETA: We'll pay you to get away with killing your pets against your will!

    PETA should not be allowed to exist at this point. They are getting way out of control with this s***. Why the f*** do they have to kill all the s*** they supposedly "save"?
    3DS: 1590-4884-9269 | Discord Chat for online gaming with Chaos! https://discord.gg/hDQ6rWb
    The more you learn, the less you know, maaan...
    Zeeak4444 5 hours ago#55
    Anarchy_Juiblex posted...
    NadYobWoc posted...
    little value


    $50k is not little value, that's more than a years worth for work for most people. Also you could breed a boat load of chihuahuas for that about of time.


    This guys so entrenched in his own perspective he's borderline delusional.
    Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
    MrMallard 5 hours ago#56
    Yeah, they're well-known for using their shelters to kill animals. There's this f***ed up "liberating them from the shackles of human greed" complex going on as far as I'm concerned.

    There are dozens of environmental activism groups that do good work and aren't buttf*** crazy. Don't support PETA, and you probably shouldn't support Greenpeace either - both groups love to pull s***ty publicity stunts and damage what they claim to be protecting.
    And we play lover's reggae, on accordion and banjo when the moon is high
    Currently playing: Yakuza 4, Rayman Origins
    1. Boards
    2. Current Events 
    3. PETA steals little girl's chihuahua, euthanizes it

No comments:

Post a Comment