Search This Blog

Friday, July 28, 2017

Texas GOP Congressman: 'If Susan Collins (R) wasn't a woman, I'd murder her ...'

  1. Boards
  2. Current Events
  3. Texas GOP Congressman: 'If Susan Collins (R) wasn't a woman, I'd murder her ...'
http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/343477-gop-lawmaker-female-senators-are-responsible-for-healthcare-bill-failure

Why are so many conservative gun nuts such sociopathic, misogynistic, and politically-correct ??
You don't need a treaty to have free trade. M Rothbard
{Self-Hating Token Asian of the Ivory Tower's Zionist Elite}
Not what he said. jc
The Admiral 4 days ago#3
https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/75601413

Here's an actual topic on this subject for people who don't have the reading comprehension of a second grader.
- The Admiral
lydiaquayle 4 days ago#4
UncleBourbon33 posted...
Not what he said. jc

That's an accurate paraphrase.
[Feminist][CisGender][Straight Supporter][Non-Binary]
I'm not Ashamed to Dress 'like a Woman' because I don't think it's Shameful to be a Woman. ~Iggy Pop~
(edited 4 days ago)quote
The Admiral 4 days ago#5
lydiaquayle posted...
UncleBourbon33 posted...
Not what he said. jc

That's an accurate paraphrase.


This is TC's alt account, BTW.
- The Admiral
Barenziah Boy Toy 3 days ago#6
UncleBourbon33 posted...
Not what he said. jc

What part wasn't true? Burr murdered Hamilton.
You don't need a treaty to have free trade. M Rothbard
{Self-Hating Token Asian of the Ivory Tower's Zionist Elite}
lydiaquayle posted...
UncleBourbon33 posted...
Not what he said. jc

That's an accurate paraphrase.

No it isn't. Dueling somebody isn't the same as murdering somebody.

Ain't the same f***in' ballpark, it ain't the same league, it ain't even the same f***in' sport.
SSJ-JohnLennon posted...
lydiaquayle posted...
UncleBourbon33 posted...
Not what he said. jc

That's an accurate paraphrase.

No it isn't. Dueling somebody isn't the same as murdering somebody.

Ain't the same f***in' ballpark, it ain't the same league, it ain't even the same f***in' sport.

Is this the "I didn't stab him, I just made this knife inhabit the same area as his chest" kind of logic
- literal garbage
Barenziah Boy Toy 2 days ago#9
SSJ-JohnLennon posted...
No it isn't. Dueling somebody isn't the same as murdering somebody.

Back in the day, a duel was to the death, was it not? And that results in a murder, does it not? And the Congressman specifically stated that he was going to be Burr, who ends up killing Hamilton.
You don't need a treaty to have free trade. M Rothbard
{Self-Hating Token Asian of the Ivory Tower's Zionist Elite}
(edited 2 days ago)quote
Paragon21XX 2 days ago#10
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
SSJ-JohnLennon posted...
No it isn't. Dueling somebody isn't the same as murdering somebody.

Back in the day, a duel was to the death, was it not? And that results in a murder, does it not? And the Congressman specifically stated that he was going to be Burr, who ends up killing Hamilton.

I don't think you quite understand what a duel is.
Hmm...
Paragon21XX posted...
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
SSJ-JohnLennon posted...
No it isn't. Dueling somebody isn't the same as murdering somebody.

Back in the day, a duel was to the death, was it not? And that results in a murder, does it not? And the Congressman specifically stated that he was going to be Burr, who ends up killing Hamilton.

I don't think you quite understand what a duel is.

Are they going to be playing Yu-Gi-Oh?

If it's a Shadow Game, that's basically to the death tbh.
Barenziah Boy Toy 2 days ago#12
Paragon21XX posted...
I don't think you quite understand what a duel is.

Two people shoot each other, with death being an acceptable conclusion. The Congressman from Texas specifically cites Burr as his goal, with Collins being Hamilton - who died from his wounds. As such, he wants Collins (if she wasn't a woman) to end up dead, just as what happened to Hamilton. aka Murder.
You don't need a treaty to have free trade. M Rothbard
{Self-Hating Token Asian of the Ivory Tower's Zionist Elite}
(edited 2 days ago)quote
Medussa 2 days ago#13
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
SSJ-JohnLennon posted...
No it isn't. Dueling somebody isn't the same as murdering somebody.

Back in the day, a duel was to the death, was it not? And that results in a murder, does it not? And the Congressman specifically stated that he was going to be Burr, who ends up killing Hamilton.


no. fatalities were actually quite rare. or, as a result of the poor medical treatment given to what would today not be a fatal hit.
Boom! That's right, this is all happening! You cannot change the channel now!
Act now! Venchmen are standing by for your orders!
Barenziah Boy Toy 2 days ago#14
Medussa posted...
no. fatalities were actually quite rare. or, as a result of the poor medical treatment given to what would today not be a fatal hit.

Except that he specifically cited the Burr vs Hamilton duel, which specifically resulted in Hamilton's death. He wasn't talking about any generic duel. He SPECIFICALLY stated that he'd be Burr, and she'd be Hamilton. So he wants her dead (if she weren't a woman).
You don't need a treaty to have free trade. M Rothbard
{Self-Hating Token Asian of the Ivory Tower's Zionist Elite}
(edited 2 days ago)quote
Medussa 2 days ago#15
that's fair, but that's not the question you asked. duels, in general, were usually simply the first to injure. unless the grievance was severe, then it could be to serious injury, or rarely, to the death. but, mistakes can happen, and even a duel to first blood could have a "lucky" shot cause a fatality.
Boom! That's right, this is all happening! You cannot change the channel now!
Act now! Venchmen are standing by for your orders!
(edited 2 days ago)quote
Axiom 2 days ago#16
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
Medussa posted...
no. fatalities were actually quite rare. or, as a result of the poor medical treatment given to what would today not be a fatal hit.

Except that he specifically cited the Burr vs Hamilton duel, which specifically resulted in Hamilton's death. He wasn't talking about any generic duel. He SPECIFICALLY stated that he'd be Burr, and she'd be Hamilton. So he wants her dead (if she weren't a woman).

Yeah he pretty much said he wanted to kill her. Anyone that argues otherwise is either being disingenuous or just stupid
AlephZero 2 days ago#17
more fake news from liberals what a surprise
"There is value in segregation." - qwertyman2002
01001100 01010101 01000101 00100000 00110100 00110000 00110010
Medussa 2 days ago#18
Axiom posted...
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
Medussa posted...
no. fatalities were actually quite rare. or, as a result of the poor medical treatment given to what would today not be a fatal hit.

Except that he specifically cited the Burr vs Hamilton duel, which specifically resulted in Hamilton's death. He wasn't talking about any generic duel. He SPECIFICALLY stated that he'd be Burr, and she'd be Hamilton. So he wants her dead (if she weren't a woman).

Yeah he pretty much said he wanted to kill her. Anyone that argues otherwise is either being disingenuous or just stupid


just to be clear, I'm not arguing otherwise. I was simply answering a general question.
Boom! That's right, this is all happening! You cannot change the channel now!
Act now! Venchmen are standing by for your orders!
Axiom 2 days ago#19
Medussa posted...
Axiom posted...
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
Medussa posted...
no. fatalities were actually quite rare. or, as a result of the poor medical treatment given to what would today not be a fatal hit.

Except that he specifically cited the Burr vs Hamilton duel, which specifically resulted in Hamilton's death. He wasn't talking about any generic duel. He SPECIFICALLY stated that he'd be Burr, and she'd be Hamilton. So he wants her dead (if she weren't a woman).

Yeah he pretty much said he wanted to kill her. Anyone that argues otherwise is either being disingenuous or just stupid


just to be clear, I'm not arguing otherwise. I was simply answering a general question.

Oh I wasn't really referring to you. Just everyone in general that is trying to downplay it with "He didn't really say he wanted to kill her"
Medussa 2 days ago#20
*thumbs-up*
Boom! That's right, this is all happening! You cannot change the channel now!
Act now! Venchmen are standing by for your orders!
ledbowman 2 days ago#21
What do partisan nut lickers itt get from playing semantics here? It's clear what he meant - why defend it?
I wish we all waved
Paragon21XX posted...
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
SSJ-JohnLennon posted...
No it isn't. Dueling somebody isn't the same as murdering somebody.

Back in the day, a duel was to the death, was it not? And that results in a murder, does it not? And the Congressman specifically stated that he was going to be Burr, who ends up killing Hamilton.

I don't think you quite understand what a duel is.
A duel isn't murderer and saying kill or murdered is much harsher and has worse connotation so you reporting it to us like that was very bias and ridiculous. 

Also the other topic made it sound plural but that's fine.
I-I really needed this~~
Time to stomp some faces!!!
Barenziah Boy Toy 1 day ago#24
LittleRoyal posted...
A duel isn't murderer and saying kill or murdered is much harsher and has worse connotation so you reporting it to us like that was very bias and ridiculous.

A duel is, at the very least, attempted murder. In the case of Burr vs Hamiltion, which is precisely what the Texas GOPer wanted to emulate, it was definitely murder.
You don't need a treaty to have free trade. M Rothbard
{Self-Hating Token Asian of the Ivory Tower's Zionist Elite}
(edited 1 day ago)quote
If you're going to use quotes at least quote what he actually said. I understand why you have to lie. You're a liberal. There is no way you could support your narrative if you told the truth. If you told the truth then you'd be a conservative.
{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
Back in the day, a duel was to the death, was it not? And that results in a murder, does it not? And the Congressman specifically stated that he was going to be Burr, who ends up killing Hamilton.

Duels are also consensual with both parties agreeing to the terms. 

Not the same as murder.
Barenziah Boy Toy 1 day ago#27
HogRiderreturns posted...
Duels are also consensual with both parties agreeing to the terms.

Consensual murder is still murder.
You don't need a treaty to have free trade. M Rothbard
{Self-Hating Token Asian of the Ivory Tower's Zionist Elite}
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
HogRiderreturns posted...
Duels are also consensual with both parties agreeing to the terms.

Consensual murder is still murder.

No when it is legal.
HogRiderreturns posted...
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
HogRiderreturns posted...
Duels are also consensual with both parties agreeing to the terms.

Consensual murder is still murder.

No when it is legal.

Except it's not. The very best you can argue is that it's not strictly illegal if there's no statute concerning it, and "well, it's technically not illegal" is a very poor defense.
(edited 1 day ago)quote
Barenziah Boy Toy 1 day ago#30
HogRiderreturns posted...
No when it is legal.

Dueling was illegal in NY/NJ at the time. That's why Burr was indicted FOR f***ING MURDER.
You don't need a treaty to have free trade. M Rothbard
{Self-Hating Token Asian of the Ivory Tower's Zionist Elite}
(edited 1 day ago)quote
UnholyMudcrab posted...
Except it's not.

It was back then. And even today there are still places where it is still legal in the books. If I remember correctly you can still duel someone in Boston Commons as long as the governor presides over it.
Axiom 1 day ago#32
Even if it actually WAS legal to duel his implication was that he wanted to kill her. Whether she would actually agree to it or not if it occurred isn't even relevant. I don't see how this is even being argued when it's so clear cut
Barenziah Boy Toy 1 day ago#33
HogRiderreturns posted...
It was back then. And even today there are still places where it is still legal in the books. If I remember correctly you can still duel someone in Boston Commons as long as the governor presides over it.

False. Dueling was illegal in the New York and New Jersey, where the duel happened.
You don't need a treaty to have free trade. M Rothbard
{Self-Hating Token Asian of the Ivory Tower's Zionist Elite}
Chad-Henne 1 day ago#34
Axiom posted...
Even if it actually WAS legal to duel his implication was that he wanted to kill her. Whether she would actually agree to it or not if it occurred isn't even relevant. I don't see how this is even being argued when it's so clear cut


Because arguing semantics is all they have left

I hope they can see their way clear to accepting the obvious.
Wow people defending this are getting blown the f*** up ITT
Hey I have an idea, while we're on the subject of what is or is not murder, let's talk about abortion :D
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
ImTheMacheteGuy posted...
Hey I have an idea, while we're on the subject of what is or is not murder, let's talk about abortion :D

Well duel I just don't consider murder because you agree to play so you're dumb if you do damned if you don't. That's a saying right? 


Abortion is just straight up murder. Oh but you're lib yeah? 

So your elike "there are 100 genders and biology if fake and you can be anything you want but if you are in the womb you aren't a living creature"
I-I really needed this~~
Time to stomp some faces!!!
LittleRoyal posted...
ImTheMacheteGuy posted...
Hey I have an idea, while we're on the subject of what is or is not murder, let's talk about abortion :D

Well duel I just don't consider murder because you agree to play so you're dumb if you do damned if you don't. That's a saying right? 


Abortion is just straight up murder. Oh but you're lib yeah? 

So your elike "there are 100 genders and biology if fake and you can be anything you want but if you are in the womb you aren't a living creature"


This wasn't a serious post right? I don't know you and it's hard to tell on this board when I don't know people.
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
thelovefist 9 hours ago#39
Imagine responding seriously to BBT
N/A
thelovefist posted...
Imagine responding seriously to BBT


Who's bbt?
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
  1. Boards
  2. Current Events 
  3. Texas GOP Congressman: 'If Susan Collins (R) wasn't a woman, I'd murder her ...'

No comments:

Post a Comment