http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/10/politics/bristol-bay-salmon-invs/index.html
"Environmental Protection Agency head Scott Pruitt met on May 1 with the CEO of the Pebble Limited Partnership, a subsidiary of the mining company, CNN reported on September 22 based on interviews and government emails. Little more than an hour later, according to internal emails, the administrator directed his staff to reverse Obama-era protections for Bristol Bay, which had been created after years of scientific review. Based on that work, the previous administration had aimed to pre-emptively veto certain mining activities in the ecologically important region." can ANYONE deny that this administration isn't a f***ing Captain Planet villain at this point?
Switch FC: SW-0826-5923-7882 NNID: Seadrake
It is a remake, not my fault you people think ports are remakes (but only on Nintendo systems)-Demondog666 |
Lordgold666 posted...
I'm a joke poster.
261 - More troll food than any other board on the net.
What the right sounds like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rYqF_BtIwAU |
Oh, s***, that's in Alaska. Alaska counts for the majority of the US's wildcaught fidshing industry, and the mine pollution could affect states south, as well. It is very sensitive habitat. Trump is an a****** for this, as is the mining company.
As the article states, if the mine goes ahead, the damage cannot be easily reversed; it would take decades if not centuries. I was seriously hoping that this was somewhere in the Atlantic. I hope the State of Alaska says no...
Meet Captain Euro, the coolest superhero this side of Aquaman!~~Portal of Evil
[Disillusioned Independent] |
BTW, important factoid of the article:
This is because wild-caught salmon is not an automated industry (except for the processing) Mining would not create nearly as many jobs. Many of those jobs are by Native Americans. Most of these Alaskan fishermen lack any other skills; loss of the fishery would place them in the same boat as the coal miners. Alaska is one of the few places left in the world where salmon can thrive due to the lack of dams and the cold water (Everything from Oregon south is too warm and oxygen poor-- AND there are dams in all the waterways from mid-Washington south) BTW, Pebble Ltd isn't even an American company. It's a Canadian one.
Meet Captain Euro, the coolest superhero this side of Aquaman!~~Portal of Evil
[Disillusioned Independent] |
PhlogPyro posted...
Jimayo posted...Lordgold666 posted...CNN is a joke "news" organization That may be true, but we both know that's not what he means. Doing a poor job of covering the news is not the same as being fake.
261 - More troll food than any other board on the net.
What the right sounds like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rYqF_BtIwAU |
Yup, and at the cost of thousands of American jobs. Unlike the wildcaught fishing industry, the mining industry has undergone quite a bit of automation. No way in hell that this gold/copper/molybdenum mine will provide a total of 14,000 American jobs.
Of course, Trump has proven that he only cares about certain types of jobs. You'll note how he never talks about the lost or jeopardized tech, fishing, or lumber industry jobs. Even though there are communities w. of the Mississippi who are in a similar situation to the coal belt due to the loss of the lumber industry. Trump has only shown interest in oil, coal, mining, and manufacturing jobs. (and of course he won't give a s*** about lost tech jobs, because he LOVES India for letting him build his s*** there. Just like he goes after Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. but never says a negative word about United Arab Emirates, where he had a golf course built by one of the top-3 worst construction companies in UAE when it comes to literal migrant slave labor.)
Meet Captain Euro, the coolest superhero this side of Aquaman!~~Portal of Evil
[Disillusioned Independent] |
Jimayo posted...
PhlogPyro posted...Jimayo posted...Lordgold666 posted...CNN is a joke "news" organization The local Alaskan news is saying basically the same thing. this one fishery and region supply more than half of the world's sockeye salmon. Probably 80-90% of America's sockeye salmon comes from there as well. These aren't just jobs for Alaskans, either. A large portion of the nation's migrant fishing industry (yes, American migrants, not Mexican ones) works summers in Alaska. Murkowski is strongly opposed to it, BTW (even though she is pro-ANWAR drilling). I can't find info on what the Alaskan governor thinks, but his track record is worrisome. (though the good news is that he screams "states' rights!" and only seems to be in bed with the hunting and oil industries. He's in favor of allowing bear and similar cruel animal traps... which are also dangerous to humans and pets.)
Meet Captain Euro, the coolest superhero this side of Aquaman!~~Portal of Evil
[Disillusioned Independent] |
Hyena 20 posted...
I repeat: The mining company is a Canadian one. apparently it doesn't matter as long as it involves "muh mining"
Switch FC: SW-0826-5923-7882 NNID: Seadrake
It is a remake, not my fault you people think ports are remakes (but only on Nintendo systems)-Demondog666 |
The stock symbol for this mine is $NAK. I rode it up about 350% since Trump won because it's always a hot topic.
You're better off waiting for a better entry point though, the mining won't start for a long while. Edit: just so you're all aware, this mine would be the most valuable in the world with over $1 trillion in minerals. So it's not just any old mine we're talking about here. |
pnut027 posted...
Who's the planet to get in the way of 💰💰💰? Captain Planet?
3DS Friend Code: 0387-9017-6003 DC:5400-2358-7574 NID:TheChoujinVirus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mQScjlXbBE #torentialdownpour in a nutshell |
We need these mines to help America save the jobs of the people who need jobs in mines. Sorry if you can not dine on Salmon every night "liberals" but peoples lives are more important and their JOBS. Salmon is 12 dollars a pound here and most people cant even afford it so too bad rich "liberals".
http://www.youtube.com/user/Thereal50inchDLP -My youtube http://otrarchive.blogspot.com/2014/02/fibber-mcgee-and-molly.html -Best show ever
|
ClayGuida posted...
OffDogs posted...Tom_Green_II posted......Pruitt's aware you can't EAT coal right? Was asking as I usually don't and so I'm not sure why the you can't eat coal argument would be used. If one rested eats expensive fish (at least where I'm from). Then coal could be a better benefit. However acolytes pointed it is a Canadian company and so no,. I don't support this then. Also being an a****** doesn't make you superior.
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, Back Blue
I will fight socialism til hell freezes over, then I will fight on the ice. |
Ryan914 posted...
Sczoyd posted...Sad when the agency meant to protect the environment is now about selling the environment for profit. The Animus River shouldn't be on the EPA. It was already compromised when they began the work. The problem was there was no way to tell how extensively compromised it was. Had the EPA done nothing, it would have completely breached and been much much worse. Its ironic in a topic about mines and rivers you brought up an incident caused by a poorly constructed mine near a river.
In Brady We Trust.
I've finally realized the secret to making a successful Mearn topic. Make it about CZG - Mearn |
OffDogs posted...
ClayGuida posted...OffDogs posted...Tom_Green_II posted......Pruitt's aware you can't EAT coal right? Salmon is an expensive fish...??
A wild blog has appeared!
http://thedeepindigo.wordpress.com - A new blog about M:TG and other games: this one has updates! |
The people who live there have their livelihoods dependent on salmon, is that worth sacrificing for a mine?
And salmon is one of the most popular fish in the entire word
Switch FC: SW-0826-5923-7882 NNID: Seadrake
It is a remake, not my fault you people think ports are remakes (but only on Nintendo systems)-Demondog666 |
OffDogs posted...
ClayGuida posted...OffDogs posted...Tom_Green_II posted......Pruitt's aware you can't EAT coal right? Salmon is cheap as s*** in Alaska and a crucial part of the environment in both its predators and controlling salmon prey population.
In Brady We Trust.
I've finally realized the secret to making a successful Mearn topic. Make it about CZG - Mearn |
OffDogs posted...
Tom_Green_II posted......Pruitt's aware you can't EAT coal right? Lol salmon is probably the most commonly eaten fish in the world right now. If they f*** up alaskas salmon population that would be a catastrophic blow to the seafood industry.
sigless user
|
OffDogs posted...
ClayGuida posted...OffDogs posted...Tom_Green_II posted......Pruitt's aware you can't EAT coal right? In what world would causing a natural habitat for anything to be destroyed be a good thing. It's as if people don't understand the basic fundamentals of an ecosystem. That's not a partisan term.
lolAmerica
|
acolytes posted...
lostsaint8911 posted...We are going to allow a Canadian company to destroy 14000 American jobs, which has an output of close to half a billion dollars annually. No one with any common sense does.
#NotAllPepes
|
Mirage13 posted...
ITT: TC is talking as if Salmon fisheries are a good thing but they have negative effects on natural habitats and the environment, as well. ...this isn't man made. And Alaska is home to the few sustainable ones
Switch FC: SW-0826-5923-7882 NNID: Seadrake
It is a remake, not my fault you people think ports are remakes (but only on Nintendo systems)-Demondog666 |
Charismic Zach Gowen posted...
OffDogs posted...ClayGuida posted...OffDogs posted...Tom_Green_II posted......Pruitt's aware you can't EAT coal right? Yeah in Alaska. Not in rural Iowa.
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, Back Blue
I will fight socialism til hell freezes over, then I will fight on the ice. |
OffDogs posted...
Tom_Green_II posted......Pruitt's aware you can't EAT coal right? Ya, man...No one eats fish and salmon. It's like some of you are having a race to say the most idiotic thing on here. You're winning btw.
I will try and see it from your point of view, but I doubt we'll be able to fit both our heads up there.
|
Mirage13 posted...
ITT: TC is talking as if Salmon fisheries are a good thing but they have negative effects on natural habitats and the environment, as well. ITP: Poster doesn't read article, doesn't understand the concept of wild and made an utter fool of himself.
I will try and see it from your point of view, but I doubt we'll be able to fit both our heads up there.
|
Ellesarien posted...
OffDogs posted...Tom_Green_II posted......Pruitt's aware you can't EAT coal right? I f***ing love fish but in my area salmon isn't cheap so I was asking if it's a bigger deal to him. I live on a land surrounded by big land, continent land and its not cheap to ship fish.
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, Back Blue
I will fight socialism til hell freezes over, then I will fight on the ice. |
OffDogs posted...
Ellesarien posted...OffDogs posted...Tom_Green_II posted......Pruitt's aware you can't EAT coal right? Oh s***...I didn't know that. Well f***, if salmon is more expensive in one f***ing rural town in Iowa, we shouldn't care about it and should kill off the industry. Beef is a little more expensive in my area than in Iowa...so no one eats it right???? Derp..derp..derp. Are you off your meds?
I will try and see it from your point of view, but I doubt we'll be able to fit both our heads up there.
|
- Boards
- Politics
- the Trump administration wants to turn a valuable Salmon fishery into a mine
OffDogs posted...Tom_Green_II posted...
...Pruitt's aware you can't EAT coal right?
How often do you eat salmon?
Lmao I knew someone was gonna say it. Not surprised it was you."I'm a baby killer, baby killing makes me horny. Aliens inside me, gonna squash it like Sigourney" ~Get Dat Fetus, Kill Dat Fetus - Sextina AquafinaGradieus posted...The stock symbol for this mine is $NAK. I rode it up about 350% since Trump won because it's always a hot topic.
You're better off waiting for a better entry point though, the mining won't start for a long while.
Edit: just so you're all aware, this mine would be the most valuable in the world with over $1 trillion in minerals.
So it's not just any old mine we're talking about here.
f*** AMERICAN JOBS AND f*** A VITAL SALMON REGION
MUH STOCK PROFEETS IS ALL THAT MATTERS!
Stop being trash. It's not ok to support Trump here."I'm a baby killer, baby killing makes me horny. Aliens inside me, gonna squash it like Sigourney" ~Get Dat Fetus, Kill Dat Fetus - Sextina Aquafinamortimerjames posted...we can find more salmon
we only have so much coal
Then it's a good thing we have an unlimited source of sun, wind and water.
We can't "just find more salmon" this is one of the highest producing areas for the world salmon supply. There's a f***ing reason for that.
Will you stop sucking so hard? Like, just f***ing stop already. It's not f***ing cute or whatever the f*** you think you're doing here. Tired of this asinine s***."I'm a baby killer, baby killing makes me horny. Aliens inside me, gonna squash it like Sigourney" ~Get Dat Fetus, Kill Dat Fetus - Sextina AquafinaMirage13 posted...ITT: TC is talking as if Salmon fisheries are a good thing but they have negative effects on natural habitats and the environment, as well.
Just say NO to man-made fisheries.
ITP the poster makes it clear he's an ignorant joke that should never be taken seriously. Just in case you're new to the board, you're welcome for the warning.
Also to the sadass joke of a poster, you think man-made fisheries destroy natural habitats more than f***ing coal mines? f***ing LOL"I'm a baby killer, baby killing makes me horny. Aliens inside me, gonna squash it like Sigourney" ~Get Dat Fetus, Kill Dat Fetus - Sextina AquafinaEllesarien posted...OffDogs posted...
Ellesarien posted...
OffDogs posted...
Tom_Green_II posted...
...Pruitt's aware you can't EAT coal right?
How often do you eat salmon?
Ya, man...No one eats fish and salmon. It's like some of you are having a race to say the most idiotic thing on here. You're winning btw.
I f***ing love fish but in my area salmon isn't cheap so I was asking if it's a bigger deal to him. I live on a land surrounded by big land, continent land and its not cheap to ship fish.
Oh s***...I didn't know that. Well f***, if salmon is more expensive in one f***ing rural town in Iowa, we shouldn't care about it and should kill off the industry.
Beef is a little more expensive in my area than in Iowa...so no one eats it right????
Derp..derp..derp.
Are you off your meds?
Did I defend this mine anywhere? I just don't give a s*** about the salmon either. The point in asking was to point out that people may benefit from this mine and perhaps fuel for electricity is more useful than fish. I've also conceded that since this is a Canadian company it's a bulls*** deal all around.the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, Back Blue
I will fight socialism til hell freezes over, then I will fight on the ice.So this doofus wants to make salmon more expensive than it already is. That's just dandy.The face of college hockey - http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2209/2318158448_c9d69b6edb_o.jpgKing of Inland posted...So this doofus wants to make salmon more expensive than it already is. That's just dandy.
Just an average American tbh.
I mean think about this :
OffDogs posted...I just don't give a s*** about the salmon either.
What are you going to do with this type of "Only care about what affects me" attitude? That IS becoming America in all its glory.I will try and see it from your point of view, but I doubt we'll be able to fit both our heads up there.Ellesarien posted...King of Inland posted...
So this doofus wants to make salmon more expensive than it already is. That's just dandy.
Just an average American tbh.
I mean think about this :
OffDogs posted...I just don't give a s*** about the salmon either.
What are you going to do with this type of "Only care about what affects me" attitude? That IS becoming America in all its glory.
If it's going to benefit the locations people then I'm all for it. I presume this deal benefits the Canadian company so I'm not.the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, Back Blue
I will fight socialism til hell freezes over, then I will fight on the ice.OffDogs posted...Ellesarien posted...
King of Inland posted...
So this doofus wants to make salmon more expensive than it already is. That's just dandy.
Just an average American tbh.
I mean think about this :
OffDogs posted...I just don't give a s*** about the salmon either.
What are you going to do with this type of "Only care about what affects me" attitude? That IS becoming America in all its glory.
If it's going to benefit the locations people then I'm all for it. I presume this deal benefits the Canadian company so I'm not.
Even if this were an American company, I don't see the benefits. There's already loads of jobs from the fishery, and it provides the local area food for a lower price.
How could destroying that for a dying industry like coal have an benefits?Empty the Tanks.
Ivory Free.50inchDLP posted...We need these mines to help America save the jobs of the people who need jobs in mines. Sorry if you can not dine on Salmon every night "liberals" but peoples lives are more important and their JOBS. Salmon is 12 dollars a pound here and most people cant even afford it so too bad rich "liberals".
by killing jobs of people who need jobs in food
oh yeah only liberal eats salmon everybody knows that lolif I'm always right I learn nothing, if I'm wrong twice I learn 2 thingsHyena 20 posted...I repeat: The mining company is a Canadian one.
What ever happened to Trump's "America first!" policy?
As a Canadian, f*** that company.http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/Mattvsin.png
PSN: MattVSinDancedreamer posted...Remember when Captain Planet villains were unrealistic and largely jokes? Those were the days.
trump is basically lutan plunter hoggish greedly that rat guy and blight all rolled in to one3 things 1. i am female 2. i havea msucle probelm its hard for me to typ well 3.*does her janpuu dance*slaity posted...50inchDLP posted...
We need these mines to help America save the jobs of the people who need jobs in mines. Sorry if you can not dine on Salmon every night "liberals" but peoples lives are more important and their JOBS. Salmon is 12 dollars a pound here and most people cant even afford it so too bad rich "liberals".
by killing jobs of people who need jobs in food
oh yeah only liberal eats salmon everybody knows that lol
Or how about (like I said before) the pet food industry that also uses salmon and other type of fish for their formulas? Especially the companies that are stationed in the US that state that they don't use material outside of the US? Nope, they are just "liberals".When were you under the impression that being a "JRPG hipster" is a bad thing?Kradek posted...Mirage13 posted...
ITT: TC is talking as if Salmon fisheries are a good thing but they have negative effects on natural habitats and the environment, as well.
Just say NO to man-made fisheries.
ITP the poster makes it clear he's an ignorant joke that should never be taken seriously. Just in case you're new to the board, you're welcome for the warning.
Also to the sadass joke of a poster, you think man-made fisheries destroy natural habitats more than f***ing coal mines? f***ing LOL
Apparently you never heard how man made fisheries can seriously affect natural fishing habitats with introducing new diseases to natural population and altering behavioral patterns that natural salmon populations are not accustomed too, to name a few things. I wrote a paper on this s*** while in college (my degree is in Natural Resources and Environmental Policy). I think I am pretty qualified to speak on this subject matter after putting in many hours of research into how man-made fisheries affect the environment.
Also, did you and the rest of the clowns who are trolling me miss the part where I included, "as well" in my original comment? I am saying both man-made fisheries and coal mining are not good things. God, you people are dense.If you care at all for gaming, you will NEVER support microtransactions or loot boxes.50inchDLP posted...We need these mines to help America save the jobs of the people who need jobs in mines. Sorry if you can not dine on Salmon every night "liberals" but peoples lives are more important and their JOBS. Salmon is 12 dollars a pound here and most people cant even afford it so too bad rich "liberals".
Lmao, is this for real? Can people really be this mentally challenged?Lock her up!acolytes posted...OffDogs posted...
Ellesarien posted...
King of Inland posted...
So this doofus wants to make salmon more expensive than it already is. That's just dandy.
Just an average American tbh.
I mean think about this :
OffDogs posted...I just don't give a s*** about the salmon either.
What are you going to do with this type of "Only care about what affects me" attitude? That IS becoming America in all its glory.
If it's going to benefit the locations people then I'm all for it. I presume this deal benefits the Canadian company so I'm not.
Even if this were an American company, I don't see the benefits. There's already loads of jobs from the fishery, and it provides the local area food for a lower price.
How could destroying that for a dying industry like coal have an benefits?
I've conceded the actual argument, I was just clarifying my posts.the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, Back Blue
I will fight socialism til hell freezes over, then I will fight on the ice.Mirage13 posted...Kradek posted...
Mirage13 posted...
ITT: TC is talking as if Salmon fisheries are a good thing but they have negative effects on natural habitats and the environment, as well.
Just say NO to man-made fisheries.
ITP the poster makes it clear he's an ignorant joke that should never be taken seriously. Just in case you're new to the board, you're welcome for the warning.
Also to the sadass joke of a poster, you think man-made fisheries destroy natural habitats more than f***ing coal mines? f***ing LOL
Apparently you never heard how man made fisheries can seriously affect natural fishing habitats with introducing new diseases to natural population and altering behavioral patterns that natural salmon populations are not accustomed too, to name a few things. I wrote a paper on this s*** while in college (my degree is in Natural Resources and Environmental Policy). I think I am pretty qualified to speak on this subject matter after putting in many hours of research into how man-made fisheries affect the environment.
Also, did you and the rest of the clowns who are trolling me miss the part where I included, "as well" in my original comment? I am saying both man-made fisheries and coal mining are not good things. God, you people are dense.
And did you miss the part where this fishery is natural?
Someone else pointed it out, curiously you haven't addressed that."I'm a baby killer, baby killing makes me horny. Aliens inside me, gonna squash it like Sigourney" ~Get Dat Fetus, Kill Dat Fetus - Sextina Aquafinahoax123 posted...What is it with conservatives weird fettish for mining? In their world, the only job for "real muricans" is working in the mines, apparently.
Dude, if you don't get the Black Lung by age 25...you're not a true real American.I will try and see it from your point of view, but I doubt we'll be able to fit both our heads up there.Kradek posted...Mirage13 posted...
Kradek posted...
Mirage13 posted...
ITT: TC is talking as if Salmon fisheries are a good thing but they have negative effects on natural habitats and the environment, as well.
Just say NO to man-made fisheries.
ITP the poster makes it clear he's an ignorant joke that should never be taken seriously. Just in case you're new to the board, you're welcome for the warning.
Also to the sadass joke of a poster, you think man-made fisheries destroy natural habitats more than f***ing coal mines? f***ing LOL
Apparently you never heard how man made fisheries can seriously affect natural fishing habitats with introducing new diseases to natural population and altering behavioral patterns that natural salmon populations are not accustomed too, to name a few things. I wrote a paper on this s*** while in college (my degree is in Natural Resources and Environmental Policy). I think I am pretty qualified to speak on this subject matter after putting in many hours of research into how man-made fisheries affect the environment.
Also, did you and the rest of the clowns who are trolling me miss the part where I included, "as well" in my original comment? I am saying both man-made fisheries and coal mining are not good things. God, you people are dense.
And did you miss the part where this fishery is natural?
Someone else pointed it out, curiously you haven't addressed that.
There is no such thing as a "natural" fishery unless it is created by the fish themselves, which that of in itself is a habitat. Anything with the label fishery attached to it is man-made with the sole purpose of creating more fish through man-made processes.If you care at all for gaming, you will NEVER support microtransactions or loot boxes.Mirage13 posted...Kradek posted...
Mirage13 posted...
Kradek posted...
Mirage13 posted...
ITT: TC is talking as if Salmon fisheries are a good thing but they have negative effects on natural habitats and the environment, as well.
Just say NO to man-made fisheries.
ITP the poster makes it clear he's an ignorant joke that should never be taken seriously. Just in case you're new to the board, you're welcome for the warning.
Also to the sadass joke of a poster, you think man-made fisheries destroy natural habitats more than f***ing coal mines? f***ing LOL
Apparently you never heard how man made fisheries can seriously affect natural fishing habitats with introducing new diseases to natural population and altering behavioral patterns that natural salmon populations are not accustomed too, to name a few things. I wrote a paper on this s*** while in college (my degree is in Natural Resources and Environmental Policy). I think I am pretty qualified to speak on this subject matter after putting in many hours of research into how man-made fisheries affect the environment.
Also, did you and the rest of the clowns who are trolling me miss the part where I included, "as well" in my original comment? I am saying both man-made fisheries and coal mining are not good things. God, you people are dense.
And did you miss the part where this fishery is natural?
Someone else pointed it out, curiously you haven't addressed that.
There is no such thing as a "natural" fishery unless it is created by the fish themselves, which that of in itself is a habitat. Anything with the label fishery attached to it is man-made with the sole purpose of creating more fish through man-made processes.
Oh Jesus....a libertarian view on food.....I will try and see it from your point of view, but I doubt we'll be able to fit both our heads up there.Ellesarien posted...Mirage13 posted...
Kradek posted...
Mirage13 posted...
Kradek posted...
Mirage13 posted...
ITT: TC is talking as if Salmon fisheries are a good thing but they have negative effects on natural habitats and the environment, as well.
Just say NO to man-made fisheries.
ITP the poster makes it clear he's an ignorant joke that should never be taken seriously. Just in case you're new to the board, you're welcome for the warning.
Also to the sadass joke of a poster, you think man-made fisheries destroy natural habitats more than f***ing coal mines? f***ing LOL
Apparently you never heard how man made fisheries can seriously affect natural fishing habitats with introducing new diseases to natural population and altering behavioral patterns that natural salmon populations are not accustomed too, to name a few things. I wrote a paper on this s*** while in college (my degree is in Natural Resources and Environmental Policy). I think I am pretty qualified to speak on this subject matter after putting in many hours of research into how man-made fisheries affect the environment.
Also, did you and the rest of the clowns who are trolling me miss the part where I included, "as well" in my original comment? I am saying both man-made fisheries and coal mining are not good things. God, you people are dense.
And did you miss the part where this fishery is natural?
Someone else pointed it out, curiously you haven't addressed that.
There is no such thing as a "natural" fishery unless it is created by the fish themselves, which that of in itself is a habitat. Anything with the label fishery attached to it is man-made with the sole purpose of creating more fish through man-made processes.
Oh Jesus....a libertarian view on food.....
Interesting how you contradict yourself if you are against the salmon not allowed to create their own natural habitats but instead through man-made fisheries but are against the mining too, something done through man-made processes, as well. Then again, that's all you Liberals know is hypocrisy; so this shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone with an ounce of intelligence.If you care at all for gaming, you will NEVER support microtransactions or loot boxes.Mirage13 posted...Kradek posted...
Mirage13 posted...
Kradek posted...
Mirage13 posted...
ITT: TC is talking as if Salmon fisheries are a good thing but they have negative effects on natural habitats and the environment, as well.
Just say NO to man-made fisheries.
ITP the poster makes it clear he's an ignorant joke that should never be taken seriously. Just in case you're new to the board, you're welcome for the warning.
Also to the sadass joke of a poster, you think man-made fisheries destroy natural habitats more than f***ing coal mines? f***ing LOL
Apparently you never heard how man made fisheries can seriously affect natural fishing habitats with introducing new diseases to natural population and altering behavioral patterns that natural salmon populations are not accustomed too, to name a few things. I wrote a paper on this s*** while in college (my degree is in Natural Resources and Environmental Policy). I think I am pretty qualified to speak on this subject matter after putting in many hours of research into how man-made fisheries affect the environment.
Also, did you and the rest of the clowns who are trolling me miss the part where I included, "as well" in my original comment? I am saying both man-made fisheries and coal mining are not good things. God, you people are dense.
And did you miss the part where this fishery is natural?
Someone else pointed it out, curiously you haven't addressed that.
There is no such thing as a "natural" fishery unless it is created by the fish themselves, which that of in itself is a habitat. Anything with the label fishery attached to it is man-made with the sole purpose of creating more fish through man-made processes.
Ok, so upon further reading it's not a fishery, it's a bay and salmon run that a lot of fishermen use.
And while I get that fisheries can ruin habitats the position of this mine would be far more detrimental than what you think is already happening or has happened.
It's all in the article,very in-depth."I'm a baby killer, baby killing makes me horny. Aliens inside me, gonna squash it like Sigourney" ~Get Dat Fetus, Kill Dat Fetus - Sextina AquafinaKradek posted...Mirage13 posted...
Kradek posted...
Mirage13 posted...
Kradek posted...
Mirage13 posted...
ITT: TC is talking as if Salmon fisheries are a good thing but they have negative effects on natural habitats and the environment, as well.
Just say NO to man-made fisheries.
ITP the poster makes it clear he's an ignorant joke that should never be taken seriously. Just in case you're new to the board, you're welcome for the warning.
Also to the sadass joke of a poster, you think man-made fisheries destroy natural habitats more than f***ing coal mines? f***ing LOL
Apparently you never heard how man made fisheries can seriously affect natural fishing habitats with introducing new diseases to natural population and altering behavioral patterns that natural salmon populations are not accustomed too, to name a few things. I wrote a paper on this s*** while in college (my degree is in Natural Resources and Environmental Policy). I think I am pretty qualified to speak on this subject matter after putting in many hours of research into how man-made fisheries affect the environment.
Also, did you and the rest of the clowns who are trolling me miss the part where I included, "as well" in my original comment? I am saying both man-made fisheries and coal mining are not good things. God, you people are dense.
And did you miss the part where this fishery is natural?
Someone else pointed it out, curiously you haven't addressed that.
There is no such thing as a "natural" fishery unless it is created by the fish themselves, which that of in itself is a habitat. Anything with the label fishery attached to it is man-made with the sole purpose of creating more fish through man-made processes.
Ok, so upon further reading it's not a fishery, it's a bay and salmon run that a lot of fishermen use.
And while I get that fisheries can ruin habitats the position of this mine would be far more detrimental than what you think is already happening or has happened.
It's all in the article,very in-depth.
Well then, the article is misleading if they are using the term "fishery" when in fact it is a habitat that is in danger of being destroyed. Then again, this coming from CNN, this doesn't surprise me. Gotta use that emotional language to stoke those flames of Liberal agendas somehow.
Also, for someone who cares about the environment, such as myself, damage to a natural salmon habitat is the same as the damage a coal mine would do if allowed to be excavated. They are one in the same.If you care at all for gaming, you will NEVER support microtransactions or loot boxes.Mirage13Well then, the article is misleading if they are using the term "fishery" when in fact it is a habitat that is in danger of being destroyed. Then again, this coming from CNN, this doesn't surprise me. Gotta use that emotional language to stoke those flames of Liberal agendas somehow.
Also, for someone who cares about the environment, such as myself, damage to a natural salmon habitat is the same as the damage a coal mine would do if allowed to be excavated. They are one in the same.
Among the critics likely to contact the agency are representatives from Alaska Native communities in Bristol Bay, as well as scientists like Quinn, who has dedicated his professional life to researching the area.
Quinn's concerns are based on his years researching the bay, which were incorporated into a 2014 EPA report on Bristol Bay under the Obama administration. The report, which also was based on Pebble's filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, estimated the total mine site could be larger than Manhattan and nearly as deep as the Grand Canyon.
Such a mine "would result in complete loss of fish habitat due to elimination, dewatering, and fragmentation of streams, wetlands, and other aquatic resources" in some areas of the bay watershed, the EPA found after three years of peer-reviewed research. In particular, the EPA estimated 22 miles of streams and more than 6 square miles of wetlands and other habitats that are important to salmon and other fish would be lost to a large-scale mine.
"All of these losses would be irreversible," the agency said.
Ray Hilborn, a professor in the School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences at the University of Washington. "It's not just that you have the most valuable salmon fishery in the world, it's the nature of the habitat there. The reason it's such a productive salmon place is, it's basically this giant gravel bed. But that also means it's almost impossible to contain water. It's just a giant sponge. The idea you could store highly toxic waste (from a mine) forever behind a dam is just ridiculous."
"I'm sure once a proposal is put on the table, geologists will be able to say, look, it's a no-brainer, you can't contain this stuff forever," he said.
Healthy watersheds like Bristol Bay were once much more common.
Most have been severely degraded or ruined, said David R. Montgomery, a professor of geomorphology at the University of Washington and author of "King of Fish: The Thousand-Year Run of Salmon." The Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the United States once had sizable salmon runs, he said. What remains, mostly in the Pacific, is a faint memory of what once was, he said, thanks largely to dams, urbanization, habitat loss and industrial activities like mining."I'm a baby killer, baby killing makes me horny. Aliens inside me, gonna squash it like Sigourney" ~Get Dat Fetus, Kill Dat Fetus - Sextina AquafinaKradek posted...Mirage13
Well then, the article is misleading if they are using the term "fishery" when in fact it is a habitat that is in danger of being destroyed. Then again, this coming from CNN, this doesn't surprise me. Gotta use that emotional language to stoke those flames of Liberal agendas somehow.
Also, for someone who cares about the environment, such as myself, damage to a natural salmon habitat is the same as the damage a coal mine would do if allowed to be excavated. They are one in the same.
Among the critics likely to contact the agency are representatives from Alaska Native communities in Bristol Bay, as well as scientists like Quinn, who has dedicated his professional life to researching the area.
Quinn's concerns are based on his years researching the bay, which were incorporated into a 2014 EPA report on Bristol Bay under the Obama administration. The report, which also was based on Pebble's filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, estimated the total mine site could be larger than Manhattan and nearly as deep as the Grand Canyon.
Such a mine "would result in complete loss of fish habitat due to elimination, dewatering, and fragmentation of streams, wetlands, and other aquatic resources" in some areas of the bay watershed, the EPA found after three years of peer-reviewed research. In particular, the EPA estimated 22 miles of streams and more than 6 square miles of wetlands and other habitats that are important to salmon and other fish would be lost to a large-scale mine.
"All of these losses would be irreversible," the agency said.
Ray Hilborn, a professor in the School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences at the University of Washington. "It's not just that you have the most valuable salmon fishery in the world, it's the nature of the habitat there. The reason it's such a productive salmon place is, it's basically this giant gravel bed. But that also means it's almost impossible to contain water. It's just a giant sponge. The idea you could store highly toxic waste (from a mine) forever behind a dam is just ridiculous."
"I'm sure once a proposal is put on the table, geologists will be able to say, look, it's a no-brainer, you can't contain this stuff forever," he said.
Healthy watersheds like Bristol Bay were once much more common.
Most have been severely degraded or ruined, said David R. Montgomery, a professor of geomorphology at the University of Washington and author of "King of Fish: The Thousand-Year Run of Salmon." The Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the United States once had sizable salmon runs, he said. What remains, mostly in the Pacific, is a faint memory of what once was, he said, thanks largely to dams, urbanization, habitat loss and industrial activities like mining.
What you bolded is not what you original stated. You said that the damage from the mine would be far more detrimental to the damage that would come about on that Salmon habitat. What you bolded is saying that the mine would be detrimental to that Salmon habitat, among other habitats.
So really, it sounds like we're taking the same stance. So why are we having this discussion again? lolIf you care at all for gaming, you will NEVER support microtransactions or loot boxes.Mirage13 posted...Kradek posted...
Mirage13
Well then, the article is misleading if they are using the term "fishery" when in fact it is a habitat that is in danger of being destroyed. Then again, this coming from CNN, this doesn't surprise me. Gotta use that emotional language to stoke those flames of Liberal agendas somehow.
Also, for someone who cares about the environment, such as myself, damage to a natural salmon habitat is the same as the damage a coal mine would do if allowed to be excavated. They are one in the same.
Among the critics likely to contact the agency are representatives from Alaska Native communities in Bristol Bay, as well as scientists like Quinn, who has dedicated his professional life to researching the area.
Quinn's concerns are based on his years researching the bay, which were incorporated into a 2014 EPA report on Bristol Bay under the Obama administration. The report, which also was based on Pebble's filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, estimated the total mine site could be larger than Manhattan and nearly as deep as the Grand Canyon.
Such a mine "would result in complete loss of fish habitat due to elimination, dewatering, and fragmentation of streams, wetlands, and other aquatic resources" in some areas of the bay watershed, the EPA found after three years of peer-reviewed research. In particular, the EPA estimated 22 miles of streams and more than 6 square miles of wetlands and other habitats that are important to salmon and other fish would be lost to a large-scale mine.
"All of these losses would be irreversible," the agency said.
Ray Hilborn, a professor in the School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences at the University of Washington. "It's not just that you have the most valuable salmon fishery in the world, it's the nature of the habitat there. The reason it's such a productive salmon place is, it's basically this giant gravel bed. But that also means it's almost impossible to contain water. It's just a giant sponge. The idea you could store highly toxic waste (from a mine) forever behind a dam is just ridiculous."
"I'm sure once a proposal is put on the table, geologists will be able to say, look, it's a no-brainer, you can't contain this stuff forever," he said.
Healthy watersheds like Bristol Bay were once much more common.
Most have been severely degraded or ruined, said David R. Montgomery, a professor of geomorphology at the University of Washington and author of "King of Fish: The Thousand-Year Run of Salmon." The Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the United States once had sizable salmon runs, he said. What remains, mostly in the Pacific, is a faint memory of what once was, he said, thanks largely to dams, urbanization, habitat loss and industrial activities like mining.
What you bolded is not what you original stated. You said that the damage from the mine would be far more detrimental to the damage that would come about on that Salmon habitat. What you bolded is saying that the mine would be detrimental to that Salmon habitat, among other habitats.
So really, it sounds like we're taking the same stance. So why are we having this discussion again? lol
The problem was you stating no to man-made fisheries, but you didn't read the article before posting that started a downward spiral in comparison to the current man made fishery vs the mine. Both are bad, but one is catastrophic.
I didn't read either, but in this regard a fishery is a fishing ground or area where fish are caught. Though it is also commercial in use. Thought it isn't man-made and there apparently is no fish rearing based on the context.i7-4930k, EVGA X79 Classified, CM V8 GTS, CM Stormtrooper, 16GB HyperX Sav. 1600MHz, EVGA GTX 960 2G, AMD R7 240 SSD, WD Black 1T, CM V750.
My GPU is trash. :(Mirage13 posted...Kradek posted...
Mirage13 posted...
Kradek posted...
Mirage13 posted...
Apparently you never heard how man made fisheries can seriously affect natural fishing habitats with introducing new diseases to natural population and altering behavioral patterns that natural salmon populations are not accustomed too, to name a few things. I wrote a paper on this s*** while in college (my degree is in Natural Resources and Environmental Policy). I think I am pretty qualified to speak on this subject matter after putting in many hours of research into how man-made fisheries affect the environment.
Also, did you and the rest of the clowns who are trolling me miss the part where I included, "as well" in my original comment? I am saying both man-made fisheries and coal mining are not good things. God, you people are dense.
And did you miss the part where this fishery is natural?
Someone else pointed it out, curiously you haven't addressed that.
There is no such thing as a "natural" fishery unless it is created by the fish themselves, which that of in itself is a habitat. Anything with the label fishery attached to it is man-made with the sole purpose of creating more fish through man-made processes.
Ok, so upon further reading it's not a fishery, it's a bay and salmon run that a lot of fishermen use.
And while I get that fisheries can ruin habitats the position of this mine would be far more detrimental than what you think is already happening or has happened.
It's all in the article,very in-depth.
Well then, the article is misleading if they are using the term "fishery" when in fact it is a habitat that is in danger of being destroyed.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fishery
Definition of fishery
plural fisheries
1:the occupation, industry, or season of taking fish or other sea animals (such as sponges, shrimp, or seals) :fishing
2:a place for catching fish or taking other sea animals
When you are arguing definitions and the definition you use is wrong, you probably are making your foundational arguments on quicksandThen again, this coming from CNN, this doesn't surprise me. Gotta use that emotional language to stoke those flames of Liberal agendas somehow.
So you are clearly some rightwing troll
So thats why you pulled your definition from Trumps alternative dictionaryAlso, for someone who cares about the environment, such as myself, damage to a natural salmon habitat is the same as the damage a coal mine would do if allowed to be excavated. They are one in the same.
"Sustainable fishing and coal mining destroying rivers. Same thing, both industries"
So the only thing the right has is false equivalnces?
Oh wait, I forgot his whole man made fishery argument was a deflection and a strawman
Love how Trump will destroy US jobs and companies to let a Canadian company create an almost entirely automated mine
EDIT:
USER INFO: MIRAGE13
Regular User
User Since: Jun 2017
Karma: 84
Active Posts: 79
Total Badges: 9Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with meMirage13 posted...What you bolded is not what you original stated. You said that the damage from the mine would be far more detrimental to the damage that would come about on that Salmon habitat. What you bolded is saying that the mine would be detrimental to that Salmon habitat, among other habitats.
So really, it sounds like we're taking the same stance. So why are we having this discussion again? lol
Because this article is about how this particular mine would cause devastating ecological damages and you ran in here screaming about how fisheries are just as bad for the environment without even reading the article.
The article uses the term fishery once in the opening paragraph and once in the title, far as I can tell, I don't know why other than just as, "a place a lot of people fish at". Every other time they're talking about natural bodies of water and how not f***ing with them has helped the salmon run flourish."I'm a baby killer, baby killing makes me horny. Aliens inside me, gonna squash it like Sigourney" ~Get Dat Fetus, Kill Dat Fetus - Sextina AquafinaMitsukiba posted...I didn't read either, but in this regard a fishery is a fishing ground or area where fish are caught. Though it is also commercial in use. Thought it isn't man-made and there apparently is no fish rearing based on the context.
After thoroughly reading the article I didn't see any indication of fish rearing, it's just a natural salmon run that hasn't been f***ed with by industries who would do things like install dams for toxic waste, so it's one of the last healthiest examples, thus all the salmon and profit."I'm a baby killer, baby killing makes me horny. Aliens inside me, gonna squash it like Sigourney" ~Get Dat Fetus, Kill Dat Fetus - Sextina AquafinaSo... is there any way to stop this from happening? Could Alaska block it?NNID: MWatcher27 / 3DS FC: 1203 - 9408 - 2283
http://steamcommunity.com/id/MWatcher/wishlistM-Watcher posted...So... is there any way to stop this from happening? Could Alaska block it?
yes but I have little faith in their governorSwitch FC: SW-0826-5923-7882 NNID: Seadrake
It is a remake, not my fault you people think ports are remakes (but only on Nintendo systems)-Demondog666It's disgusting how many people in this topic couldn't care less about who gets poisoned, who loses jobs, how much of a natural resource gets lost, etc. so long as they can lick Trump's balls."It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself."
- Thomas Jefferson, writing on the subject of religionmercurydude posted...It's disgusting how many people in this topic couldn't care less about who gets poisoned, who loses jobs, how much of a natural resource gets lost, etc. so long as they can lick Trump's balls.
They're a cult.261 - More troll food than any other board on the net.
What the right sounds like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rYqF_BtIwAU50inchDLP posted...We need these mines to help America save the jobs of the people who need jobs in mines. Sorry if you can not dine on Salmon every night "liberals" but peoples lives are more important and their JOBS. Salmon is 12 dollars a pound here and most people cant even afford it so too bad rich "liberals".
Did you not read any of the posts in this topic? The mine will have a net negative impact on jobs, the mine isn't going to employ anywhere near as many people as will lose their jobs in the salmon industry.I mean, i never see the right bash the left on anything because the blame game causes more issues than anything-Josh
No comments:
Post a Comment