Search This Blog

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Should sex-ed teaching mandate the learning of LGBT2Q+?

  1. Boards
  2. Politics
  3. Should sex-ed teaching mandate the learning of LGBT2Q+?
What do you think? - Results (132 votes)
Yes, the system should be equal in all ways, with "safe sex" being taught for all sexual orientations, etc.
40.15%
53
Yes, students should learn about different types of gender identities and sexual orientations.
9.09%
12
I don't really care.
9.09%
12
No, the system should stay heterosexual-oriented only.
41.67%
55
In Ontario where I live the system is mandated to teach about different types of gender identity, sexual orientation, etc.

However much of the system apart from that is up to the teacher and so sometimes there is no education on safe sex for gay couples. I think that there should be.
Just some hype.
#2
(message deleted)
Jaghave 3 days ago#3
No, schools shouldn't waste tax payer resources on such nonsense.
Vote for Jaghave for forum leader on 261. The most honest man running and who will defend all users from arbitrary TOSV.
261-politics/75780621
zhukov1943 3 days ago#4
Jaghave posted...
No, schools shouldn't waste tax payer resources on such nonsense.
'Reality,' sa molesworth 2, 'is so unspeakably sordid it make me shudder.'
young_flip 3 days ago#5
zhukov1943 posted...
Jaghave posted...
No, schools shouldn't waste tax payer resources on such nonsense.
playing: the Witcher 3
add me on steam: prejt2. "Oh my goodness. Freedom!"
young_flip posted...
zhukov1943 posted...
Jaghave posted...
No, schools shouldn't waste tax payer resources on such nonsense.

Not every student will be heterosexual.
~Hivebent4Life
3DS FC: 5069-3910-2647
young_flip posted...
zhukov1943 posted...
Jaghave posted...
No, schools shouldn't waste tax payer resources on such nonsense.
Jaghave 3 days ago#8
hivebent4life posted...
young_flip posted...
zhukov1943 posted...
Jaghave posted...
No, schools shouldn't waste tax payer resources on such nonsense.

Not every student will be heterosexual.


We don't make a left hand option for most items for 10% of the world population why are we going to make an option for 1% of it.

It not a cut curve ramp which benefit multi people outside the intended group. It just wasting funds to accomadate an irrelevant amount of people which will harm the pocket books of the majority.
Vote for Jaghave for forum leader on 261. The most honest man running and who will defend all users from arbitrary TOSV.
261-politics/75780621
Jaghave posted...
We don't make a left hand option for most items for 10% of the world population why are we going to make an option for 1% of it.It not a cut curve ramp which benefit multi people outside the intended group. It just wasting funds to accomadate an irrelevant amount of people which will harm the pocket books of the majority.

Oh no, now we're going to see facebook posts with people holding signs like "My son is left handed - he is not broken". See what you've started?
VullabySaysHi 3 days ago#10
Jaghave posted...
hivebent4life posted...
young_flip posted...
zhukov1943 posted...
Jaghave posted...
No, schools shouldn't waste tax payer resources on such nonsense.

Not every student will be heterosexual.


We don't make a left hand option for most items for 10% of the world population why are we going to make an option for 1% of it.

It not a cut curve ramp which benefit multi people outside the intended group. It just wasting funds to accomadate an irrelevant amount of people which will harm the pocket books of the majority.

15% of the population is LGBT2Q+

11% are gay, lesbian and bisexual. 4% are transgender. 

Give or take.
Just some hype.
Bond_543 3 days ago#11
so should Muslim students be forced to learn about it?
Social Democracy: Bribing idiots with "free stuff" in exchange for votes.
Truth of the progressive era: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62rI8OYFzGg
VullabySaysHi 3 days ago#12
Bond_543 posted...
so should Muslim students be forced to learn about it?

First of all I am Muslim and I am gay. And Muslims in Canada/USA are more accepting of homosexuality than some Christian denominations.

Second of all, in Canada your guardians can choose to opt-out of sex ed taught in schools
Just some hype.
He who understands baboon would do more towards metaphysics than Locke. - Charles Darwin
#14
(message deleted)
young_flip 3 days ago#15
VullabySaysHi posted...
15% of the population is LGBT2Q+

11% are gay, lesbian and bisexual. 4% are transgender. 

Give or take.

4% of the 15% or 4% of the population? There's no way the US has 13 million transgender.
playing: the Witcher 3
add me on steam: prejt2. "Oh my goodness. Freedom!"
I think the school should, but if you want to opt out, that should also be an option.
benjjjamin 3 days ago#17
Oh give me a break. Adding education for all permutations of anatomic sex takes like 5 minutes.
Put your bibles and gamergater guides down.

"I believe sex education is limited to education between a man and a woman."
The pathetic backpedalling of the right. Any hill they can die on, they will try to hold because morals.

Nevermind that continuously defending the unconstitutional is abjectly amoral and unamerican.
(edited 3 days ago)reportquote
VullabySaysHi 3 days ago#18
young_flip posted...
VullabySaysHi posted...
15% of the population is LGBT2Q+

11% are gay, lesbian and bisexual. 4% are transgender. 

Give or take.

4% of the 15% or 4% of the population? There's no way the US has 13 million transgender.

4% of the population identifies as transgender. Or 3%. I forget.

Not all of them undergo operations
Just some hype.
Bond_543 3 days ago#19
VullabySaysHi posted...
First of all I am Muslim and I am gay. And Muslims in Canada/USA are more accepting of homosexuality than some Christian denominations.


anecdotes. means nothing. your probably making it up anyway as "leftists" tend to do.
Social Democracy: Bribing idiots with "free stuff" in exchange for votes.
Truth of the progressive era: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62rI8OYFzGg
VullabySaysHi 3 days ago#20
Bond_543 posted...
VullabySaysHi posted...
First of all I am Muslim and I am gay. And Muslims in Canada/USA are more accepting of homosexuality than some Christian denominations.


anecdotes. means nothing. your probably making it up anyway as "leftists" tend to do.

You can ask people on the street if you’d so like. Are Evangelicals more accepting than Muslims.

There’s studies out there on this too.
Just some hype.
What does the 2 mean? You guys keep adding letters and numbers and it makes it hard to keep up.
VullabySaysHi 3 days ago#22
darkace77450 posted...
What does the 2 mean? You guys keep adding letters and numbers and it makes it hard to keep up.

Two-Spirit. It is a First Nations concept.
Just some hype.
Bunny_Fu 3 days ago#23
wolverinerob79 posted...
Jaghave posted...
We don't make a left hand option for most items for 10% of the world population why are we going to make an option for 1% of it.It not a cut curve ramp which benefit multi people outside the intended group. It just wasting funds to accomadate an irrelevant amount of people which will harm the pocket books of the majority.

Oh no, now we're going to see facebook posts with people holding signs like "My son is left handed - he is not broken". See what you've started?

As a duly self-appointed representative of the left-handed population, allow me to say that most of us have accepted the reality of living in a right-handed world. We’re cool with it. We don’t need any of you righties to overcompensate for your right guilt by trying to force the world to be left-handed. Thanks for your concern, though :)
Count the bodies like sheep
To the rhythm of the war drums
fftstudent 3 days ago#24
When it’s all said and done folks, you either have a Penis or a Vagina. I suppose you could have both as well. 

Moving on though >_>

Sex Ed should be about teaching Boys and Girls: 

1. How to protect yourself from getting Sexual Transmitted Diseases. Use protection.

2. How our species pro creates. In other words, a boy nuts in a girls hoohah, 9 months later you both are going to be parents. Don’t want to a dad at 15? Wear protection!

Stuff that deviates from those 2 pieces of criteria, seems to be a waste of time to me.
Nothing of Great value & Worth was ever gained without some form of chance taking or risk.
young_flip 3 days ago#25
VullabySaysHi posted...
young_flip posted...
VullabySaysHi posted...
15% of the population is LGBT2Q+

11% are gay, lesbian and bisexual. 4% are transgender. 

Give or take.

4% of the 15% or 4% of the population? There's no way the US has 13 million transgender.

4% of the population identifies as transgender. Or 3%. I forget.

Not all of them undergo operations

Number still seems too high. Since you'd probably know, is there some sort of code in that community where people say things like "oh, only real transgenders get operations"?
playing: the Witcher 3
add me on steam: prejt2. "Oh my goodness. Freedom!"
VullabySaysHi posted...
young_flip posted...
VullabySaysHi posted...
15% of the population is LGBT2Q+

11% are gay, lesbian and bisexual. 4% are transgender. 

Give or take.

4% of the 15% or 4% of the population? There's no way the US has 13 million transgender.

4% of the population identifies as transgender. Or 3%. I forget.

Not all of them undergo operations

Where the hell do you get your numbers? In actual polling data, the entire LGBT community is less than 4% of the entire population. Transgender is about 0.6% of the population.

http://news.gallup.com/poll/183383/americans-greatly-overestimate-percent-gay-lesbian.aspx
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/01/health/transgender-population.html
He who laughs last, thinks fastest.
young_flip posted...
VullabySaysHi posted...
young_flip posted...
VullabySaysHi posted...
15% of the population is LGBT2Q+

11% are gay, lesbian and bisexual. 4% are transgender. 

Give or take.

4% of the 15% or 4% of the population? There's no way the US has 13 million transgender.

4% of the population identifies as transgender. Or 3%. I forget.

Not all of them undergo operations

Number still seems too high. Since you'd probably know, is there some sort of code in that community where people say things like "oh, only real transgenders get operations"?


That is because it is too high. He is using the top end of estimates (and some that are just flat out bulls***).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States

I have never seen a figure that shows LGBT > 7% of the U.S population.
(edited 3 days ago)reportquote
JcOpIVY86 3 days ago#28
I didn't learn about anything other than the anatomy and how babies are made in sex ed. 
Nothing about anal, bjs, etc so I'm going to say no.
Sometimes it's what you don't do that makes you who you are.
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y115/jckorn86/smallerbanner.jpg
Jaghave 3 days ago#29
JcOpIVY86 posted...
I didn't learn about anything other than the anatomy and how babies are made in sex ed. 
Nothing about anal, bjs, etc so I'm going to say no.


that what porn is for
Vote for Jaghave for forum leader on 261. The most honest man running and who will defend all users from arbitrary TOSV.
261-politics/75780621
VullabySaysHi 3 days ago#30
TheShadowViper posted...
young_flip posted...
VullabySaysHi posted...
young_flip posted...
VullabySaysHi posted...
15% of the population is LGBT2Q+

11% are gay, lesbian and bisexual. 4% are transgender. 

Give or take.

4% of the 15% or 4% of the population? There's no way the US has 13 million transgender.

4% of the population identifies as transgender. Or 3%. I forget.

Not all of them undergo operations

Number still seems too high. Since you'd probably know, is there some sort of code in that community where people say things like "oh, only real transgenders get operations"?


That is because it is too high. He is using the top end of estimates (and some that are just flat out bulls***).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States

I have never seen a figure that shows LGBT > 7% of the U.S population.

That is because those are all how many people identify themselves as LGBT+. If everyone was open, researchers believe it would be at around the number I gave.

This is contrary to the amount most Americans think; many believe that 20-30% of the population is LGBT+
Just some hype.
mercurydude 3 days ago#31
Superlnfinity45 posted...

Be careful, Putin might not know you meant that in sarcasm and might stop sending you rubles, or may even have you curbstomped. Remember, such things are both illegal and subject to violent repercussions in Russia.
"It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself." 
- Thomas Jefferson, writing on the subject of religion
ArtiRock 3 days ago#32
No. And the poll is dumb. It's not that I think the sex-ed should stay hetero only, it's just that many things related to sexual education already apply to homosexuals. You know, sexual diseases, development of one's body, anatomy of the human body, etc. 

My class didn't teach me anything that wouldn't apply to other sexualities, so the idea of bringing that up seems unwarranted.
This is the duty of the Grim Angels.
young_flip 3 days ago#33
VullabySaysHi posted...
That is because those are all how many people identify themselves as LGBT+. If everyone was open, researchers believe it would be at around the number I gave.

Your numbers are off and probably made up. Plus, willy actually gave sources, you didn't. He is more believable.
playing: the Witcher 3
add me on steam: prejt2. "Oh my goodness. Freedom!"
ArtiRock posted...
No. And the poll is dumb. It's not that I think the sex-ed should stay hetero only, it's just that many things related to sexual education already apply to homosexuals. You know, sexual diseases, development of one's body, anatomy of the human body, etc. 

My class didn't teach me anything that wouldn't apply to other sexualities, so the idea of bringing that up seems unwarranted.

The only thing that covered in mine that wouldn't have applied to other sexualities (and remember, this was 20+ years ago) was the effectiveness of various "traditional" forms of birth control. And stressing that even if they were kinda-sorta effective at that, they wouldn't stop you from catching crotch rot.
He who laughs last, thinks fastest.
VullabySaysHi 3 days ago#35
young_flip posted...
VullabySaysHi posted...
That is because those are all how many people identify themselves as LGBT+. If everyone was open, researchers believe it would be at around the number I gave.

Your numbers are off and probably made up. Plus, willy actually gave sources, you didn't. He is more believable.

In cities where homosexuality is accepted as a whole, 10-15% identity as gay

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_sexual_orientation
Just some hype.
Nitro378 3 days ago#36
Just put Jaghave on ignore, he's gone full conservatroll.
Why is it only called class war when we fight back? https://youtu.be/fUuK6JtP7xA
Number of 30-day suspensions for attacking Zionism: 3
young_flip 3 days ago#37
VullabySaysHi posted...
young_flip posted...
VullabySaysHi posted...
That is because those are all how many people identify themselves as LGBT+. If everyone was open, researchers believe it would be at around the number I gave.

Your numbers are off and probably made up. Plus, willy actually gave sources, you didn't. He is more believable.

In cities where homosexuality is accepted as a whole, 10-15% identity as gay

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_sexual_orientation

Fallacy of composition. They could just be concentrated there.
playing: the Witcher 3
add me on steam: prejt2. "Oh my goodness. Freedom!"
Prototypic 3 days ago#38
That acronym is getting out of hand.
Thus I became a madman.
K181 3 days ago#39
Prototypic posted...
That acronym is getting out of hand.


Pretty much. They just need to go with something short and constant. I think someone else on this board once suggested GSD, Gender and Sexual Diversity. Bam, do it.
The poster formerly known as Kakarot181: July 2, 2002 - March 14, 2012.
Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less.
Bunny_Fu posted...
wolverinerob79 posted...
Jaghave posted...
We don't make a left hand option for most items for 10% of the world population why are we going to make an option for 1% of it.It not a cut curve ramp which benefit multi people outside the intended group. It just wasting funds to accomadate an irrelevant amount of people which will harm the pocket books of the majority.

Oh no, now we're going to see facebook posts with people holding signs like "My son is left handed - he is not broken". See what you've started?

As a duly self-appointed representative of the left-handed population, allow me to say that most of us have accepted the reality of living in a right-handed world. We’re cool with it. We don’t need any of you righties to overcompensate for your right guilt by trying to force the world to be left-handed. Thanks for your concern, though :)

Ah, if only it were a left-handed world :(
twuck sreet twuck
"Hold this pasta, baby!"
TopuKekGX 3 days ago#41
Looked it up. Gallup says about 4% of the population is LGBTQ. I don’t really see why that should be a deciding factor on this issue, though. Every student should get the sex-ed they need.

Also, we have to mandate sex-ed before we mandate what is in sex-ed.
(edited 3 days ago)reportquote
Tenlaar 3 days ago#42
I do feel like, and I'm admitting this is based on personal feeling and speculation, that the "true LGBT percentages" that would account for people who feel that way but won't admit it would bump it up a fair bit simply because of the B. Just from my experiences in life, knowing people and observing the relations of people around me, I think that plain old bisexual is going to become a much larger group in the coming decades as the stigma against same-sex relations continues to lessen.
pnut027 3 days ago#43
Jaghave posted...
hivebent4life posted...
young_flip posted...
zhukov1943 posted...
Jaghave posted...
No, schools shouldn't waste tax payer resources on such nonsense.

Not every student will be heterosexual.


We don't make a left hand option for most items for 10% of the world population why are we going to make an option for 1% of it.

It not a cut curve ramp which benefit multi people outside the intended group. It just wasting funds to accomadate an irrelevant amount of people which will harm the pocket books of the majority.

But you agree that left handed options do exist, correct?
You guys hate SJWs? Blame your favorite developers for pandering to white men for the past 30 years.
TonyKojima 3 days ago#44
Yes absolutely we must normalize it so later it stops being an issue.
Though the XBOX 360 is good in theory, it's hardware limitations say otherwise - Hideo Kojima 
PSN - Guncrazy56, Board leader of 261 Politics.
ZeroX91 3 days ago#45
All sex ed should be doing is teaching kids what the parts are and what they do, leave the rest for them to figure out....maybe emphasizes condoms and what not. 

Treating LBGTQRSTUV like they are something different just leads people to thinking they are different...you know instead of just being like "Oh I guess Jim likes Fred."
Put your grasses on...
VullabySaysHi posted...
TheShadowViper posted...
young_flip posted...
VullabySaysHi posted...
young_flip posted...
VullabySaysHi posted...
15% of the population is LGBT2Q+

11% are gay, lesbian and bisexual. 4% are transgender. 

Give or take.

4% of the 15% or 4% of the population? There's no way the US has 13 million transgender.

4% of the population identifies as transgender. Or 3%. I forget.

Not all of them undergo operations

Number still seems too high. Since you'd probably know, is there some sort of code in that community where people say things like "oh, only real transgenders get operations"?


That is because it is too high. He is using the top end of estimates (and some that are just flat out bulls***).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States

I have never seen a figure that shows LGBT > 7% of the U.S population.

That is because those are all how many people identify themselves as LGBT+. If everyone was open, researchers believe it would be at around the number I gave.

This is contrary to the amount most Americans think; many believe that 20-30% of the population is LGBT+


What "many people believe" and what is reality is often different. Very often. There is no legitimate study showing the numbers you suggested. Bring up your source.
JOExHIGASHI 3 days ago#47
Sex ed for me was about reproduction and std's

I don't see how sexual orientation would be relevant
Puzzle and Dragons: 338 705 421
atmasabr 3 days ago#48
Gender identity has nothing to do with sex.

Sexual orientation does.

End of discussion.
Do your own research!
I'm fine with LGB in sex ed.

T in sex ed I don't think really fits in that well unless for sex education you're doing all about maturation too. T isn't a sexual orientation as such.

2Q - well 1 Q is covered by LGB and the other relating to "gender Queer" is a load of bollocks made up by Gender studies because people don't like that their choice is Male or Female or Refuse to say.

VullabySaysHi posted...

15% of the population is LGBT2Q+

11% are gay, lesbian and bisexual. 4% are transgender. 

Give or take.

27500% of statistics on the internet are pulled from a persons rectum if they didn't say the source of them.

According to the 2010 US census

3.8% of the population identify as LGBT.

3.5% of the population are LGB

0.3% are T

darkace77450 posted...
What does the 2 mean? You guys keep adding letters and numbers and it makes it hard to keep up.


It's because it was LGBTQQ+
so it's now LGBT 2 Times Q +

It's 
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning, Gender Queer and others.

Though personally I thought the most recent one was LGBT2Qi+

Because the i was for intersex.
Don't like Lootboxes in Shadow of War?
Join me in telling Warner Brothers https://www.thunderclap.it/projects/62477-shadow-of-war-we-say-no-more
(edited 3 days ago)reportquote
Kradek 3 days ago#50
It should be equal and there's really no issue for that. Everybody should learn about dental dam and condoms. 

There's nothing special they'd need to be privy to.

I will say this, when we learned about sex ed in school they didn't go over the fact that anal is the most likely way to transmit HIV/AIDS during sex.

Which is once again something all of them could learn. Even lesbians who never plan to have anal should still know so they can tell their non-lesbian friends.
"I'm a baby killer, baby killing makes me horny. Aliens inside me, gonna squash it like Sigourney" ~Get Dat Fetus, Kill Dat Fetus - Sextina Aquafina
(edited 3 days ago)reportquote
  1. Boards
  2. Politics
  3. Should sex-ed teaching mandate the learning of LGBT2Q+?
    1. Boards
    2. Politics
    3. Should sex-ed teaching mandate the learning of LGBT2Q+?
    Jaghave 3 days ago#51
    @Nitro378 posted...
    Just put Jaghave on ignore, he's gone full conservatroll.


    I didn't say anything outside common sense the 99% shouldn't bleed money to accomadate the 1%
    Vote for Jaghave for forum leader on 261. The most honest man running and who will defend all users from arbitrary TOSV.
    261-politics/75780621
    ZeroX91 2 days ago#52
    Dwavenhobble posted...
    I'm fine with LGB in sex ed.

    T in sex ed I don't think really fits in that well unless for sex education you're doing all about maturation too. T isn't a sexual orientation as such.

    2Q - well 1 Q is covered by LGB and the other relating to "gender Queer" is a load of bollocks made up by Gender studies because people don't like that their choice is Male or Female or Refuse to say.

    VullabySaysHi posted...

    15% of the population is LGBT2Q+

    11% are gay, lesbian and bisexual. 4% are transgender. 

    Give or take.

    27500% of statistics on the internet are pulled from a persons rectum if they didn't say the source of them.

    According to the 2010 US census

    3.8% of the population identify as LGBT.

    3.5% of the population are LGB

    0.3% are T

    darkace77450 posted...
    What does the 2 mean? You guys keep adding letters and numbers and it makes it hard to keep up.


    It's because it was LGBTQQ+
    so it's now LGBT 2 Times Q +

    It's 
    Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning, Gender Queer and others.

    Though personally I thought the most recent one was LGBT2Qi+

    Because the i was for intersex.

    The .000000000000001% chance of being born with both sets of reproductive organs doesn't really seem like it warrants a separate designation most people that are don't ever even realize it in their lifetime just think they are sterile or infertile.
    Put your grasses on...
    EvoTech 2 days ago#53
    Jaghave posted...
    No, schools shouldn't waste tax payer resources on such nonsense.
    Now Playing: Atelier Sophie / Legend of Zelda - Breath of the Wild / FFXIV: Stormblood
    ZeroX91 posted...

    The .000000000000001% chance of being born with both sets of reproductive organs doesn't really seem like it warrants a separate designation most people that are don't ever even realize it in their lifetime just think they are sterile or infertile.


    Yeh but they were also including other things in intersex like XXY (Klinefelter syndrome), XXYY etc
    Don't like Lootboxes in Shadow of War?
    Join me in telling Warner Brothers https://www.thunderclap.it/projects/62477-shadow-of-war-we-say-no-more
    themastah 2 days ago#55
    This name is getting too goddamned long. Can we just shorten it to L already?
    A wild blog has appeared!
    http://thedeepindigo.wordpress.com - A new blog about M:TG and other games: this one has updates!
    ZeroX91 2 days ago#56
    Dwavenhobble posted...
    ZeroX91 posted...

    The .000000000000001% chance of being born with both sets of reproductive organs doesn't really seem like it warrants a separate designation most people that are don't ever even realize it in their lifetime just think they are sterile or infertile.


    Yeh but they were also including other things in intersex like XXY (Klinefelter syndrome), XXYY etc

    I mean I guess that isn't technically wrong...just not what a majority of people are gonna think they are talking about.
    Put your grasses on...
    themastah posted...
    This name is getting too goddamned long. Can we just shorten it to L already?

    What's wrong with LGBT2QIAWTFBBQ?
    Sylph 2 days ago#58
    VullabySaysHi posted...
    15% of the population is LGBT2Q+

    11% are gay, lesbian and bisexual. 4% are transgender.

    Give or take.

    The trans aren't separate from the counts for gay, lesbian and bisexual.
    ZSB: We look so much better in a dress than you.
    I wouldn't mind being alone if I could stand my own company.
    (edited 2 days ago)reportquote
    Dyinglegacy 2 days ago#59
    wolverinerob79 posted...
    This name is getting too goddamned long. Can we just shorten it to L already?

    What's wrong with LGBT2QIAWTFBBQ?


    LGBTQrstuvwxyz
    PSN: KillingLegacy Gamertag: Killing Legacy
    (edited 2 days ago)reportquote
    tl0_olt 2 days ago#60
    It should be taught that they are usually harmless mental disorders.
    VullabySaysHi 2 days ago#61
    For the 10% percentage I used, it is not an official statistic but one researchers have used and that I agree with. If we had a perfectly accepting world where sexuality was an open concept, it is likely that 10-12% of the population would be LGB and 3-4% would be T. Of course this is just predictive data

    In many official surveys in countries such as Australia, 8% of people reported feeling attraction to the same sex but still said they were straight. So, add that to the usually 3-4% of people being openly LGB and you get like 11%.

    Transgender is even harder to be open about 

    tl0_olt posted...
    It should be taught that they are usually harmless mental disorders.

    Literally how?
    Just some hype.
    PhlogPyro 2 days ago#62
    I get the LGBT acronym. LGBTQ is okay too I guess, though I don't see the point of the Q since it means the exact same thing as L and G. 

    What the literal f*** is "LGBT2Q+"? 

    f*** it, I identify as a goddamn attack helicopter. Teach that in schools will ya bucko?
    MH IGN: Pyro || HR 900+ || Insect Glaive
    Hunters' Hub Discord server: https://discord.gg/ffuebqQ
    Ryan914 2 days ago#63
    PhlogPyro posted...
    I get the LGBT acronym. LGBTQ is okay too I guess, though I don't see the point of the Q since it means the exact same thing as L and G. 

    What the literal f*** is "LGBT2Q+"? 

    f*** it, I identify as a goddamn attack helicopter. Teach that in schools will ya bucko?


    People are tired of hearing: "I identify as a LGBLT Sandwich"
    PhlogPyro 2 days ago#64
    Ryan914 posted...
    PhlogPyro posted...
    I get the LGBT acronym. LGBTQ is okay too I guess, though I don't see the point of the Q since it means the exact same thing as L and G. 

    What the literal f*** is "LGBT2Q+"? 

    f*** it, I identify as a goddamn attack helicopter. Teach that in schools will ya bucko?


    People are tired of hearing: "I identify as a LGBLT Sandwich"

    LGBT does sound like a pretty delicious f***ing sandwich.
    Libertarian social democrat, free speech absolutist. I hate the SJW left and the alt-right equally. 
    Proud ethnic Kekistani.
    Amatsukaze 2 days ago#65
    wolverinerob79 posted...
    themastah posted...
    This name is getting too goddamned long. Can we just shorten it to L already?

    What's wrong with LGBT2QIAWTFBBQ?
    Dyinglegacy 2 days ago#66
    Ryan914 posted...
    PhlogPyro posted...
    I get the LGBT acronym. LGBTQ is okay too I guess, though I don't see the point of the Q since it means the exact same thing as L and G. 

    What the literal f*** is "LGBT2Q+"? 

    f*** it, I identify as a goddamn attack helicopter. Teach that in schools will ya bucko?


    People are tired of hearing: "I identify as a LGBLT Sandwich"


    People are also probably tired of hearing LGBT with a new symbol added to it every few months lol.

    And damn you. Now i want a large blt sandwitch.
    PSN: KillingLegacy Gamertag: Killing Legacy
    (edited 2 days ago)reportquote
    Jaghave 2 days ago#67
    Dyinglegacy posted...
    Ryan914 posted...
    PhlogPyro posted...
    I get the LGBT acronym. LGBTQ is okay too I guess, though I don't see the point of the Q since it means the exact same thing as L and G. 

    What the literal f*** is "LGBT2Q+"? 

    f*** it, I identify as a goddamn attack helicopter. Teach that in schools will ya bucko?


    People are tired of hearing: "I identify as a LGBLT Sandwich"


    People are also probably tired of hearing LGBT with a new symbol added to it every few months lol.

    And damn you. Now i want a large blt sandwitch.


    Leteus
    Garlic
    Bacon
    Tailor ham
    Sandwich
    Vote for Jaghave for forum leader on 261. The most honest man running and who will defend all users from arbitrary TOSV.
    261-politics/75780621
    young_flip 7 hours ago#68
    PhlogPyro posted...

    LGBT does sound like a pretty delicious f***ing sandwich.

    sounds like there'd be a lot of mayo on that sandwich.

    I hate mayo
    playing:
    add me on steam: prejt2. "Oh my goodness. Freedom!"
    OffDogs 7 hours ago#69
    I know sex Ed often skips health issues pertaining to homosexual sex so yes we should cover that. But going over the entire 56 fictional genders is a waste of time. Simply cover that sexual preference isn't black and white and to not be an a****** unless they're pressuring you over your own.
    the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, Back Blue
    I will fight socialism til hell freezes over, then I will fight on the ice.
    LawnNinja 7 hours ago#70
    Sex ed should absolutely cover safe sex practices for homosexual couples, same as it does for heterosexuals. 

    Sex ed has no reason whatsoever to include discussion of trendy gender identities, because one's gender identity has nothing to do with safe sex.
    "It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    ArtiRock 7 hours ago#71
    LawnNinja posted...
    Sex ed should absolutely cover safe sex practices for homosexual couples, same as it does for heterosexuals. 

    Sex ed has no reason whatsoever to include discussion of trendy gender identities, because one's gender identity has nothing to do with safe sex.

    That's the thing though, what exactly can homosexaual people do that a hetero couple can't?
    This is the duty of the Grim Angels.
    OffDogs 7 hours ago#72
    ArtiRock posted...
    LawnNinja posted...
    Sex ed should absolutely cover safe sex practices for homosexual couples, same as it does for heterosexuals. 

    Sex ed has no reason whatsoever to include discussion of trendy gender identities, because one's gender identity has nothing to do with safe sex.

    That's the thing though, what exactly can homosexaual people do that a hetero couple can't?

    Aids is a much larger problem to gay men than straight men.
    the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, Back Blue
    I will fight socialism til hell freezes over, then I will fight on the ice.
    ArtiRock 6 hours ago#73
    OffDogs posted...
    ArtiRock posted...
    LawnNinja posted...
    Sex ed should absolutely cover safe sex practices for homosexual couples, same as it does for heterosexuals. 

    Sex ed has no reason whatsoever to include discussion of trendy gender identities, because one's gender identity has nothing to do with safe sex.

    That's the thing though, what exactly can homosexaual people do that a hetero couple can't?

    Aids is a much larger problem to gay men than straight men.

    That's from anal sex though. Which can be done with both sexs.
    This is the duty of the Grim Angels.
    LawnNinja 6 hours ago#74
    ArtiRock posted...
    OffDogs posted...
    ArtiRock posted...
    LawnNinja posted...
    Sex ed should absolutely cover safe sex practices for homosexual couples, same as it does for heterosexuals. 

    Sex ed has no reason whatsoever to include discussion of trendy gender identities, because one's gender identity has nothing to do with safe sex.

    That's the thing though, what exactly can homosexaual people do that a hetero couple can't?

    Aids is a much larger problem to gay men than straight men.

    That's from anal sex though. Which can be done with both sexs.

    My point is that sex ed should openly include anal sex in lessons on safe sex practices. My own school's sex ed classes didn't.
    "It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    ArtiRock 6 hours ago#75
    LawnNinja posted...
    ArtiRock posted...
    OffDogs posted...
    ArtiRock posted...
    LawnNinja posted...
    Sex ed should absolutely cover safe sex practices for homosexual couples, same as it does for heterosexuals. 

    Sex ed has no reason whatsoever to include discussion of trendy gender identities, because one's gender identity has nothing to do with safe sex.

    That's the thing though, what exactly can homosexaual people do that a hetero couple can't?

    Aids is a much larger problem to gay men than straight men.

    That's from anal sex though. Which can be done with both sexs.

    My point is that sex ed should openly include anal sex in lessons on safe sex practices. My own school's sex ed classes didn't.

    Oh... Well that should be discussed, but it's not just for homosexuality. Everyone should learn that.
    This is the duty of the Grim Angels.
    Prototypic posted...
    That acronym is getting out of hand.


    That's not even it's final form.

    http://s3.amazonaws.com/libapps/accounts/32228/images/1-TURFrF3BGNG6sKNJ_rPpYQ.jpeg
    LawnNinja 6 hours ago#77
    ArtiRock posted...
    LawnNinja posted...
    ArtiRock posted...
    OffDogs posted...
    ArtiRock posted...
    LawnNinja posted...
    Sex ed should absolutely cover safe sex practices for homosexual couples, same as it does for heterosexuals. 

    Sex ed has no reason whatsoever to include discussion of trendy gender identities, because one's gender identity has nothing to do with safe sex.

    That's the thing though, what exactly can homosexaual people do that a hetero couple can't?

    Aids is a much larger problem to gay men than straight men.

    That's from anal sex though. Which can be done with both sexs.

    My point is that sex ed should openly include anal sex in lessons on safe sex practices. My own school's sex ed classes didn't.

    Oh... Well that should be discussed, but it's not just for homosexuality. Everyone should learn that.

    Yes they should, and it's precisely because anal sex is mainly associated with gays that it's sometimes excluded from sex ed curriculums.
    "It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    Bunny_Fu 6 hours ago#78
    Holes is holes. Schools should teach kids to put their little spelunker in a suit if they want him to stay safe in strange caves.

    Actually there’s a lot of stuff they should teach. It boggles the mind that there are people who think you can’t pick up anything from oral or anal. Holes is holes, people!
    Count the bodies like sheep
    To the rhythm of the war drums
    ArtiRock 6 hours ago#79
    Bunny_Fu posted...
    Actually there’s a lot of stuff they should teach. It boggles the mind that there are people who think you can’t pick up anything from oral or anal. Holes is holes, people!

    This.
    This is the duty of the Grim Angels.
    Yami_no_Geimu 6 hours ago#80
    So how many new letters, numbers, and symbols are going to be added to this thing? When I first saw the "2T+" or whatever, I thought it was some kind of satire.
    VullabySaysHi 5 hours ago#81
    cyanide_suicide posted...
    Prototypic posted...
    That acronym is getting out of hand.


    That's not even it's final form.

    http://s3.amazonaws.com/libapps/accounts/32228/images/1-TURFrF3BGNG6sKNJ_rPpYQ.jpeg

    That is missing the 2 for Two-Spirit, and an A for Agender (it can be replaced for Ally as Allies are not LGBTQ+ themselves)
    Just some hype.
    (edited 5 hours ago)reportquote
    OffDogs 2 hours ago#82
    ArtiRock posted...
    OffDogs posted...
    ArtiRock posted...
    LawnNinja posted...
    Sex ed should absolutely cover safe sex practices for homosexual couples, same as it does for heterosexuals. 

    Sex ed has no reason whatsoever to include discussion of trendy gender identities, because one's gender identity has nothing to do with safe sex.

    That's the thing though, what exactly can homosexaual people do that a hetero couple can't?

    Aids is a much larger problem to gay men than straight men.

    That's from anal sex though. Which can be done with both sexs.

    Agreed but it's not the primary mo for most.
    the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, Back Blue
    I will fight socialism til hell freezes over, then I will fight on the ice.
    IMadepooh4U 2 hours ago#83
    No. Marxism has no place in education.
    The ancient Oracle said that I was the wisest of all the Greeks. It is because I alone, of all the Greeks, know that I know nothing- Socrates
    VullabySaysHi 2 hours ago#84
    IMadepooh4U posted...
    No. Marxism has no place in education.

    This is a troll right
    Just some hype.
    Not really, and I think most people would guess that I'd be for it. But you're talking about sex-ed, not gender studies. Sex is sex, bottom line. 

    Just teach safe sex practices. Please avoid the BS about staying abstinent until you are married or are in a committed relationship. (I live in Texas - this is literally what they told us a decade ago). 

    Show the male students exactly how to put on condoms. Give out condoms for the guys to try on at home. I don't see how this is scandalous - it's just smart. Explain to the guys how necessary condoms are in hookup situations. 

    Teach both guys and gals how important it is to get tested for STD's. Even if they only plan to have straight sex, they should know they are still at definite risk of contacting HIV or Syphilis. Tell them about free clinics in the area where they can get tested and even treated for free. 

    Also...anal sex is a form of straight sex? You can strictly be a straight guy and still be pegged in the ass by a woman wearing a strap-on - this is literally a heterosexual form of sex, no matter what you wanna read into the power dynamics. And obviously guys can plow their woman in the ass too - this is pretty common for unmarried straight couples in Islamic countries where they're just trying to avoid breaking the female's hymen during intercourse.
    Matter is error. Whoa.
    (edited 1 hour ago)reportquote
    No, I don't think it should. Sex ed should focus only on teaching safe sex and how to avoid pregnancy. Gay couples obviously can't get pregnant and aside from that, anything you would teach to straight couples about safe sex would also apply to gay couples.
    dj4242 1 hour ago#87
    Jaghave posted...
    No, schools shouldn't waste tax payer resources on such nonsense.
    #MAGA
    Got a Chris Paul mindstate, I'm never out of bounds
    masticatingman posted...
    You can strictly be a straight guy and still be pegged in the ass by a woman wearing a strap-on - this is literally a heterosexual form of sex


    No real man would ever allow a woman to do that to him. Just saying. I guess in today's liberal controlled society it doesn't surprise me though.
    XxAxem_BlackxX posted...
    masticatingman posted...
    You can strictly be a straight guy and still be pegged in the ass by a woman wearing a strap-on - this is literally a heterosexual form of sex


    No real man would ever allow a woman to do that to him. Just saying. I guess in today's liberal controlled society it doesn't surprise me though.


    By definition, it's heterosexual. I can't find the definition for "real man" in my dictionary.
    Matter is error. Whoa.
    Abiz_ 1 hour ago#90
    hivebent4life posted...
    Not every student will be heterosexual.

    What exactly do non-heterosexuals need to know that isn't covered by sex-ed?
    (edited 1 hour ago)reportquote
    Heterosexuality, per dictionary.com:

    noun
    1.
    sexual feeling or behavior directed toward a person or persons of the opposite sex.
    Matter is error. Whoa.
    masticatingman posted...
    XxAxem_BlackxX posted...
    masticatingman posted...
    You can strictly be a straight guy and still be pegged in the ass by a woman wearing a strap-on - this is literally a heterosexual form of sex


    No real man would ever allow a woman to do that to him. Just saying. I guess in today's liberal controlled society it doesn't surprise me though.


    By definition, it's heterosexual. I can't find the definition for "real man" in my dictionary.


    Cuck is in the dictionary though now isn't it?
    1. Boards
    2. Politics 
    3. Should sex-ed teaching mandate the learning of LGBT2Q+?

No comments:

Post a Comment