- Boards
- Current Events
- Here we go again. Stars blame sexism on Ocean's 8 lukewarm reviews
Stars of Ocean’s 8, the heist movie featuring all-female leads, have accused male critics of failing to appreciate their film. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/jun/15/oceans-8-dominance-men-film-reviews -- I guess they are taking a que from Star Wars and blaming ever negative review on sexism.
Bender: Well, everybody, I just saved a turtle. What have you done with your lives?
|
.....I literally did not even realize they were making an Ocean's 8.
I'd blame marketing.
PSN ID: Aristoph
http://www.youtube.com/user/SotCRules |
I mean, in both RT scores and 7 day gross, 8 has done better than 12. And 12 was pretty hyped coming off 11.
Maybe the entire series after 11 is just lackluster. It's not like the reviews are even that bad or anything.
"Scranton is great, but New York is like Scranton on acid. No, on speed. Nah. On steroids."
FC: 3282-3258-0224 |
LockeMonster posted...
I mean, in both RT scores and 7 day gross, 8 has done better than 12. And 12 was pretty hyped coming off 11. That one came out like years and years ago. So I guess if you adjust from inflation it might not look so good for 8. And with the Incredibles coming out this week , I don't think it will have legs.
Bender: Well, everybody, I just saved a turtle. What have you done with your lives?
|
Sure, because movies like Shape of Water, or Lady Bird with female leads, weren't some of the biggest movies of last year.
Make a movie that actually looks interesting and I'll watch it. Not a sequel noone wanted, without the actors who we loved on those movies in the first place.
Dear lord, Spyker just ripped his entire life apart in nothing more than a few paragraphs. Ouch... - RexSilver
|
It seems like Mindy Kaling has a habit of blaming all of her woes on outside influences instead of her just not being very talented or likeable.
|
DrizztLink posted...
It seems like Mindy Kaling has a habit of blaming all of her woes on outside influences instead of her just not being very talented or likeable. Yeah let’s just ignore reviewers are super left wing and the reviews for ghostbusters literally mentioned evil sexism in every positive review. This wasn’t as bad but didn’t have the backlash. I mean look at the reviews compared to audience scores. |
cjsdowg posted...
That one came out like years and years ago. So I guess if you adjust from inflation it might not look so good for 8. And with the Incredibles coming out this week , I don't think it will have legs. Currently 8 is 60 and 12 was 50. Adjusted for inflation puts 12 at around 65. Not much difference, plus it had an extra $40 million for the budget compared to 8 and reviews are not subject to inflation.
"Scranton is great, but New York is like Scranton on acid. No, on speed. Nah. On steroids."
FC: 3282-3258-0224 |
It's sad because no one challenges these people on their statements or even says "Could it be because it wasn't very good?"
|
Sometimes shitty movies are just shitty movies, but if there's a primarily female cast, they just tout it as sexism. Ghost Busters Reboot was a really shitty movie, and not in an enjoyable way.
Resident Evil and Underworld movies are really shitty, but in a fun way. Nobody downs that. These movies are just trying to make a statement and not trying to make a compelling movie. The story, acting, and directing are all secondary to the pat on the back that they're looking for
You haven't set a signature for the message boards yet
|
thelovefist posted...
These topics are like lightning rods for incels "You only dislike this movies because you hates womenz!" "No I just thought it was bad." "UR AN INCEL!" Jesus christ
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg |
cjsdowg posted...
I guess they are taking a que from Star Wars and blaming ever negative review on sexism. In a way. I think it's a bit more complicated than that. In the case of Star Wars, it was basically "this is Star Wars, nerds. You should like it because it's doing Star Wars things, no matter who the main character is". Whereas for Ocean's 8 it's more like "this movie wasn't made for white men, so why are white men the majority of the ones reviewing it?" Not to mention that Star Wars actually had the critics' back and it was the fanbase that rebelled, whereas in this case, they don't have the critics either. This is more in line with the Brie Larson Wrinkle In Time topic we had earlier this week. The idea that certain movies would be reviewed better if the review base was more diverse. Then again, I haven't seen either, so I have no opinion on either Wrinkle in Time or Ocean's 8.
CyricZ
|
scar the 1 posted...
Regardless of the reviews, it's quite a fair point that white men make up 80% of the critics, no? Fair in the sense that it may be factually true. But not particularly relevant. Unless you believe white men can't fairly review a movie that stars women, for some reason. But then you would have to explain away all the times those white men gave movies starring women positive reviews. |
Esrac posted...
Unless you believe white men can't fairly review a movie that stars women Again, it's a little more complicated than that. Different people with different backgrounds can have different perspectives on a story. Take Get Out for example. It's a very obvious example, because the vast majority of critics did approve it. There were aspects of Get Out that make a lot of sense if you grew up in the American black experience, and the movie went well out of its way to show that. There are other movies that are similar in how they show the black experience (either realistically or fantastically), but the facets are more subtle, and it would take someone who did grow up in the black American experience to catch on. This is not to say we should be touting the idea of "X movie is only good if you're black", BUT with a more diverse review base, we can more easily determine which audience responds well to a movie, and whether the critical response is due to culture or actual quality.
CyricZ
|
Was it also sexist that I didn't care to watch any of the Ocean's movies?
|
CyricZ posted...
cjsdowg posted...I guess they are taking a que from Star Wars and blaming ever negative review on sexism. What? The way you make it sound most of the bad reviews are from men. That's just not true.
No sig.
|
cjsdowg posted...
Speaking to Yahoo Movies, Mindy Kaling called the dominance of white male reviewers “unfair”. “If I had to base my career on what white men wanted I would be very unsuccessful, so there is obviously an audience out there who want to watch things like [Ocean’s 8], what I work on, what Sarah [Paulson] works on.” Why does it always come back to white men specifically? If they simply want to complain about men in general reviewing the film that would be one thing, but they just love bitch about about white men at any opportunity.
There's no business to be taxed.
|
DifferentialEquation posted...
cjsdowg posted...Speaking to Yahoo Movies, Mindy Kaling called the dominance of white male reviewers “unfair”. “If I had to base my career on what white men wanted I would be very unsuccessful, so there is obviously an audience out there who want to watch things like [Ocean’s 8], what I work on, what Sarah [Paulson] works on.” Considering that those same white males won't hesitate to pan a film even if it's catering to their demographic ( e.g. the last Die Hard movie, the last Terminator movie etc.), her argument holds no water. Besides, what exactly about the premise of a heist movie starring attractive women wouldnt appeal to men? What gender-specific nuances, if any, wouldnt they get? Maybe it just didnt turn out well. Its not like this movie had nostalgia working against it like the Ghostbusters fiasco.
The folks who know about frostiness stay frostiest the most.
|
16-BITTER posted...
Its not like this movie had nostalgia working against it like the Ghostbusters fiasco Think again! Many people see the reboot of Ocean's 11 starring Brad Pitt & George Clooney as a bonafide modern classic! Even if it was just an average movie! & Despite having a different title, we all know this is just a female reboot a la Ghostbusters. Anywho, it doesn't matter if you're white, black or both! This movie probably SUCKS!
Hey! Ummm..
Puhuhuhu :3 |
UnfairRepresent posted...
@thelovefist posted...These topics are like lightning rods for incels got 'em gorebyss
https://i.imgtc.com/lvIltqO.png
Life before death. Strength before weakness. Journey before destination. |
DifferentialEquation posted...
cjsdowg posted...Speaking to Yahoo Movies, Mindy Kaling called the dominance of white male reviewers “unfair”. “If I had to base my career on what white men wanted I would be very unsuccessful, so there is obviously an audience out there who want to watch things like [Ocean’s 8], what I work on, what Sarah [Paulson] works on.” Because white men hold the most power over every other race of men. |
creativerealms posted...
What? The way you make it sound most of the bad reviews are from men. That's just not true. Is that not a fact? I'm not suggesting no white men liked it, but your statement of "most of the bad reviews are from men" is likely true. Of course, most of the good reviews are from men as well, because of the skewed demographics of the critic base. And that's my whole point, and the point of the argument of a more diverse critic base.
CyricZ
|
CyricZ posted...
creativerealms posted...What? The way you make it sound most of the bad reviews are from men. That's just not true. ^ they got a point there. Most good reviews were also from white males. I bet they don't mind having those white males review the movie. It's the other white males that didn't fawn all over it they mind reviewing the movie.
My power is discombobulatingly devastating, I could feel his facial tissue collapse under my force. Its ludicrous these mortals even attempt to enter my realm.
|
Honesty, I don't even think the original (well remake, I've never seen the actual original) wasn't really all that great, it was decent though. The sequels were just bad and milked something that should've only been a one off thing.
I didn't even know this was coming out yet. Haven't seen ads or heard anything. I heard when it was announced because of all the bitter anti SJW's crying and then all the SJW's acting like it's the greatest thing to ever happen and shitting on anyone who thought it was a stupid idea of who wasn't actively praising it.
The above post is literally and objectively right.
|
I honestly haven't seen a single commercial or ad for this movie.
|
KainFourteh posted...
CookieMarvin posted...^^look, there’s one now!!! hey, that’d probably be better than resenting women because they won’t have sex w you |
- Boards
- Current Events
- Here we go again. Stars blame sexism on Ocean's 8 lukewarm reviews
- Boards
- Current Events
- Here we go again. Stars blame sexism on Ocean's 8 lukewarm reviews
CookieMarvin posted...KainFourteh posted...
CookieMarvin posted...
show hidden quote(s)
You're a cuck?
hey, that’d probably be better than resenting women because they won’t have sex w you
You seem to be making up a lot of shit, though I shouldn't expect anything less from someone defending SJW labels, lol.Honestly, it probably got more positive reviews than it should have simply because of the narrative.Platinum GameFAQs Member
https://imgur.com/VgwI8qOscar the 1 posted...Regardless of the reviews, it's quite a fair point that white men make up 80% of the critics, no?
Meh maybe. If it's such a problem though people should try to get some women into critiquing instead of always using ''white men critics' as one of their fall-back excuses when a movie doesn't get good reviews.You're such a boring characterless entity. Try getting laid once in a while and maybe you'll have friends and find out what a "joke" is. - derrateEsrac posted...scar the 1 posted...
Regardless of the reviews, it's quite a fair point that white men make up 80% of the critics, no?
Fair in the sense that it may be factually true. But not particularly relevant.
Unless you believe white men can't fairly review a movie that stars women, for some reason. But then you would have to explain away all the times those white men gave movies starring women positive reviews.
Of course white men can fairly review things. But when the critics are dominated by white men, one perspective will dominate. Especially in criticism, I think it's important that many perspectives are heard.Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two.stoltenberg11 posted...If it's such a problem though people should try to get some women into critiquing instead of always using ''white men critics' as one of their fall-back excuses when a movie doesn't get good reviews.
Well yeah, we should do that.
The critic base becomes more diverse.
And y'all don't have to hear the "white male critics" angle that so annoys you.
Win win.CyricZMindy recently accused all the men at a graduation ceremony of being possible sexual predators and then told the men not to listen to part of her speech because they will make more money in life over their female counterparts.You enjoy teaching high schoolers, and I'll enjoy creating my crappy manga. Let's see where we both are in a year. TheDoorMouse
Update https://imgur.com/vz0c9xfCyricZ posted...xBloodBrotherx posted...
(well remake, I've never seen the actual original)
Apparently it's kinda crap. It's a Rat Pack vehicle and they made stealing from casinos look like the easiest thing in the world.
Yeah, when I figured out it even existed that's basically all I expected it to be and never bothered to watch it.The above post is literally and objectively right.I’ve never seen not been interested in any Oceans filmSig User Logic
https://imgur.com/lA5fm7wscar the 1 posted...Esrac posted...
scar the 1 posted...
show hidden quote(s)
Fair in the sense that it may be factually true. But not particularly relevant.
Unless you believe white men can't fairly review a movie that stars women, for some reason. But then you would have to explain away all the times those white men gave movies starring women positive reviews.
Of course white men can fairly review things. But when the critics are dominated by white men, one perspective will dominate.Especially in criticism, I think it's important that many perspectives are heard.
Because all white men think the same and all have the same experiences right?One bourbon,one scotch,one beerYourDrunkFather posted...scar the 1 posted...
Esrac posted...
show hidden quote(s)
Of course white men can fairly review things. But when the critics are dominated by white men, one perspective will dominate.Especially in criticism, I think it's important that many perspectives are heard.
Because all white men think the same and all have the same experiences right?
I'm sorry, it was a clumsy wording from my side. Let's try and rephrase:
But when the critics are dominated by white men, several perspectives will be underrepresented/missing. Especially in criticism, I think it's important that many perspectives are heard.Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two.@scar_the_1
@CyricZ
How many white men should be allowed to be critics? At what lower percentage of white men does the body of critics become diverse?Do good.
Eat communists.I never saw any marketing for this film and only once saw a poster in the theaters, how the hell can they expect a film to be a hit without there being previews shown and stronger marketing.
Ghostbusters 2016 had a lot of marketing and people knew about it, Ocean’s 8 is practically an unknown, no one even knows it was coming out.doa-plus.com - We Press Forward. . . By Pressing Back.scar the 1 posted...Regardless of the reviews, it's quite a fair point that white men make up 80% of the critics, no?
No because if that is your excuse then all movies with white male leads would always have positive ratings from white male reviewers. Which of course is not true.
Highwind07 posted...I don't even know that it existed. Barely any advertisements for it anywhere and I usually am on.top of movies.
Bit it has been a long ass time since the original Oceans 11 that I didn't ask for this anyway.
And this. No marketing whatsoever of Ocean 8.[Insert tired meme here]HiddenLurker posted...No because if that is your excuse then all movies with white male leads would always have positive ratings from white male reviewers. Which of course is not true.
No, because I'm not saying that while male reviewers will always prefer movies movies with white male leads. Generally, one could try and make a similar case, along the lines of "movies are made by men, rated by men, so they will perpetuate norms and structures". But I don't think it's necessary to even go that far. It's enough to acknowledge that a diverse set of critics would offer more perspectives than a set of critics dominated by one demographic.Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two.I liked it but that's because I'm a fan of the Oceans movies.
I understand why it's not doing so well though, gender swaps are extremely lazy in terms of innovation.http://tinyurl.com/z8cf8o6 / http://tinyurl.com/jpq5l8j / http://tinyurl.com/z9y449e
\ ( ' w ') / - Ah yiss!any of them racist like that black girl from the ghostbusters remake that some liberals pretended should be ignored because i want to laugh todayFLUFFYGERM posted...@scar_the_1
@CyricZ
How many white men should be allowed to be critics? At what lower percentage of white men does the body of critics become diverse?
@scar_the_1
@CyricZ
how many white men should we allow to be employed in any given sector???Do good.
Eat communists.NurseRedHeart posted...I liked it but that's because I'm a fan of the Oceans movies.
I understand why it's not doing so well though, gender swaps are extremely lazy in terms of innovation.
I'm curious as someone who hasn't seen it: is it in your mind any way distinct from the previous movies other than the gender swap?CyricZthey should be blaming writers and directors for giving them a bad movie to star in.
if it was a legitimately funny movie that was interesting and well made, they'd get better reviews.Disclaimer: There's a good chance the above post could be sarcasm.
Die-hard Oakland A's fan --- Keep the A's in Oakland!Guerrilla Soldier posted...if it was a legitimately funny movie that was interesting and well made, they'd get better reviews.
This, people won't shit on a great movie just because it has a diverse cast; if anything they're more likely to inflate a bad movie to promote the diverse cast.The folks who know about frostiness stay frostiest the most.I don't know why nobody ever asks them "what if the movie wasn't good?" How would they address that?Ivynn posted...I don't know why nobody ever asks them "what if the movie wasn't good?" How would they address that?
same way trump addresses thingsscar the 1 posted...Esrac posted...
scar the 1 posted...
show hidden quote(s)
Fair in the sense that it may be factually true. But not particularly relevant.
Unless you believe white men can't fairly review a movie that stars women, for some reason. But then you would have to explain away all the times those white men gave movies starring women positive reviews.
Of course white men can fairly review things. But when the critics are dominated by white men, one perspective will dominate. Especially in criticism, I think it's important that many perspectives are heard.
That's bullshit, because all white men don't all have the same perspective. You're coming very close to pushing some kind of racial and gender monolithic essentialism.Esrac posted...scar the 1 posted...
Esrac posted...
show hidden quote(s)
Of course white men can fairly review things. But when the critics are dominated by white men, one perspective will dominate. Especially in criticism, I think it's important that many perspectives are heard.
That's bullshit, because all white men don't all have the same perspective. You're coming very close to pushing some kind of racial and gender monolithic essentialism.
scar really went off the deep end in the last few years. He tries hard to just skirt around it but there is basically no position that is too far left or SJW for him.Do good.
Eat communists.Esrac posted...That's bullshit, because all white men don't all have the same perspective. You're coming very close to pushing some kind of racial and gender monolithic essentialism.
Okay, so let's look at the other end, the one you're pushing.
Here in a booth we have two white men.
Here in another booth we have a white man and, let's say for simplicity, a white woman.
Are you seriously going to tell me that the differences in perspectives between the two booths are negligible?CyricZEsrac posted...That's bulls***, because all white men don't all have the same perspective. You're coming very close to pushing some kind of racial and gender monolithic essentialism.
Please see my revised phrasing. My point isn't about all white men having the same perspective, it's about the perspectives of other demographics that don't get heard.Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two.CyricZ posted...Esrac posted...
That's bullshit, because all white men don't all have the same perspective. You're coming very close to pushing some kind of racial and gender monolithic essentialism.
Okay, so let's look at the other end, the one you're pushing.
Here in a booth we have two white men.
Here in another booth we have a white man and, let's say for simplicity, a white woman.
Are you seriously going to tell me that the differences in perspectives between the two booths are negligible?
Yes.{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>CyricZ posted...Are you seriously going to tell me that the differences in perspectives between the two booths are negligible?
There is no reason to assume two white men will have the same perspective as one another on account of their skin color or gender. That is fucking racist and sexist.Do good.
Eat communists.lmao cyric literally thinks being a white male means you're part of a hivemind
didn't he claim to be a white male tooFLUFFYGERM posted...CyricZ posted...
Are you seriously going to tell me that the differences in perspectives between the two booths are negligible?
There is no reason to assume two white men will have the same perspective as one another on account of their skin color or gender. That is fucking racist and sexist.
This.
Leftists, as usual, are the ones that denote people down to their immutable charistics.{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>scar the 1 posted...Esrac posted...
That's bulls***, because all white men don't all have the same perspective. You're coming very close to pushing some kind of racial and gender monolithic essentialism.
Please see my revised phrasing. My point isn't about all white men having the same perspective, it's about the perspectives of other demographics that don't get heard.
When do you stop dividing people into various labels? Is Hollywood racist/sexist since they don't have enough Romanian critics? Or Buddhist critics? Or pansexual critics?Do good.
Eat communists.KingKongKnows posted...lmao cyric literally thinks being a white male means you're part of a hivemind
didn't he claim to be a white male too
he's gotta be a joke account. there is no way this amount of cognitive dissonance could manifest inside of a real person. dude is def a parody.Do good.
Eat communists.if he is a white male then he proved his own claims wrong that all white males are alike
because he has a different opinion to some of the white males in this topic thus proving that hes wrong
SADknuxnole posted...FLUFFYGERM posted...
knuxnole posted...
show hidden quote(s)
Source?
The world.
So basically you have no source and need to deflect to the delusions of a far left mentality in order to try to have an argument? LMAODo good.
Eat communists.- Boards
- Current Events
- Here we go again. Stars blame sexism on Ocean's 8 lukewarm reviews
- Boards
- Current Events
- Here we go again. Stars blame sexism on Ocean's 8 lukewarm reviews
CyricZ posted...This is rich coming from the group well known for divvying cultures up. They'll tell you black people are more prone to crime, illiteracy, and illegitimacy, and then will suggest that a white man and a black woman should have the exact same opinion on any given movie.
True colours shown.One bourbon,one scotch,one beerCyricZ posted...This is rich coming from the group well known for divvying cultures up. They'll tell you black people are more prone to crime, illiteracy, and illegitimacy, and then will suggest that a white man and a black woman should have the exact same opinion on any given movie.
lmfao he can't hep it
WHY ARE YOU A WHITE MALE SAYING WHITE MALES HAVE THE SAME OPINION WHEN YOU SHOW OTHERWISE
Riddle me that oh great so claimed doctor scienceKingKongKnows posted...CyricZ posted...
This is rich coming from the group well known for divvying cultures up. They'll tell you black people are more prone to crime, illiteracy, and illegitimacy, and then will suggest that a white man and a black woman should have the exact same opinion on any given movie.
lmfao he can't hep it
WHY ARE YOU A WHITE MALE SAYING WHITE MALES HAVE THE SAME OPINION WHEN YOU SHOW OTHERWISE
Riddle me that oh great so claimed doctor science
I'm pretty sure he isn't a doctor or a scientist. Dude literally just skirts around anti-white SJW rhetoric on CE every day.Do good.
Eat communists.hes claimed hes one
or atl east has
hes the hugger guy that was obsessed with white knighting cegals as a mod right??KingKongKnows posted...hes claimed hes one
or atl east has
hes the hugger guy that was obsessed with white knighting cegals as a mod right??
yep. i would be extremely surprised if cyric is actually a doctor or a scientist
maybe he meant "scientist" because he studied something worthless like sociology or w/eDo good.
Eat communists.YourDrunkFather posted...KingKongKnows posted...
hes claimed hes one
or atl east has
hes the hugger guy that was obsessed with white knighting cegals as a mod right??
I heard he used to hit on some pretty young ones too. Literal 13 year olds. Racist and a filthy pedo.
uh unless you have strong evidence of this i wouldnt go this far, the dude is already doing enough to his own brand, no need for baseless accusations about pedophilia. that just dilutes the legitimate accusations when someone really is a pedo.Do good.
Eat communists.This really just shows how insular this little cabal is.
"Hey white men have totally different views! I like butts and my buddy likes boobs! There is NOTHING in history to suggest that black people, women, Muslims, Hispanics, Asian people could have massively different perspectives based on their upbringing and culture, that a group of white men can't replicate."
Do you even listen to yourselves?
Seriously. I know you guys never leave the house, but you must have spoken to a black person or a woman at least once, right?CyricZYourDrunkFather posted...
I heard he used to hit on some pretty young ones too
i heard you used to beat up old black ladies for fun
see thats not okay to do. you don't need to make stuff up. it's wrong. he's already proven he thinks all white males are the sameit's like that sometimes man ridiculous
life can be so damn ridiculousCyricZ posted...This really just shows how insular this little cabal is.
"Hey white men have totally different views! I like butts and my buddy likes boobs! There is NOTHING in history to suggest that black people, women, Muslims, Hispanics, Asian people could have massively different perspectives based on their upbringing and culture, that a group of white men can't replicate."
Do you even listen to yourselves?
Seriously. I know you guys never leave the house, but you must have spoken to a black person or a woman at least once, right?
what is the difference between black people and black women cause you made an attempt to differ them
but furthermore doctor science man tell me why you have a different opinion to other white males but then say all white males are the sameFLUFFYGERM posted...YourDrunkFather posted...
KingKongKnows posted...
show hidden quote(s)
I heard he used to hit on some pretty young ones too. Literal 13 year olds. Racist and a filthy pedo.
uh unless you have strong evidence of this i wouldnt go this far, the dude is already doing enough to his own brand, no need for baseless accusations about pedophilia. that just dilutes the legitimate accusations when someone really is a pedo.
Someone brought it up in a topic he was embarrassing himself in yesterday and he didn't deny it...just ignored it. Not proof but definitely not a good look eitherOne bourbon,one scotch,one beerCyricZ posted...This really just shows how insular this little cabal is.
"Hey white men have totally different views! I like butts and my buddy likes boobs! There is NOTHING in history to suggest that black people, women, Muslims, Hispanics, Asian people could have massively different perspectives based on their upbringing and culture, that a group of white men can't replicate."
Do you even listen to yourselves?
Seriously. I know you guys never leave the house, but you must have spoken to a black person or a woman at least once, right?
literally melting down and doubling down on the racism and sexism lmfao.
"white men all think the same. theyre incapable of massively different perspectives based on their upbringing and culture"
fuck off dudeDo good.
Eat communists.CyricZ posted...KingKongKnows posted...
all white males are the same
Never said that. Your interpretation. I'm saying there's value in diverse criticism in media based on culture and you're saying "Nah man white dudes got this."
"All whites have the same culture and are incapable of unique diverse criticisms and perspectives in media" - @CyricZ
"Stop being racist/sexist!!!1!1!1" - Also @CyricZ
lmaoDo good.
Eat communists.CyricZ posted...KingKongKnows posted...
all white males are the same
Never said that. Your interpretation. I'm saying there's value in diverse criticism in media based on culture and you're saying "Nah man white dudes got this."
'i never said that but here's what you didn't say but i'll pretend you said anyway'
the amazing doctor science man ladies and gentlemen or is it black people and ladies because for some reason doctor science man thinks to differ between black ladies and black people in his previous postsHowl posted...scar the 1 posted...
Regardless of the reviews, it's quite a fair point that white men make up 80% of the critics, no?
Not really. That shouldn't honestly even be a job. How can a person's opinion of a movie matter more than anyone else's?
close your account pleaseEverything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two.scar the 1 posted...Howl posted...
scar the 1 posted...
show hidden quote(s)
Not really. That shouldn't honestly even be a job. How can a person's opinion of a movie matter more than anyone else's?
close your account please
NoPosted with GameRaven 3.5.1CyricZ posted...Esrac posted...
That's bullshit, because all white men don't all have the same perspective. You're coming very close to pushing some kind of racial and gender monolithic essentialism.
Okay, so let's look at the other end, the one you're pushing.
Here in a booth we have two white men.
Here in another booth we have a white man and, let's say for simplicity, a white woman.
Are you seriously going to tell me that the differences in perspectives between the two booths are negligible?
I think it depends on the personal experiences and dispositions of the individual men and women in the booths. The perspectives of the two white men could have significantly more variance than the perspectives of the man and woman.
Instead, let's put PZ Meyers in one booth with Alex Jones.
Then put Ivanka and Eric Trump in the other booth.
I'd wager the perspectives of Ivanka and Eric are a lot closer than PZ and Alex.CyricZ posted...This really just shows how insular this little cabal is.
"Hey white men have totally different views! I like butts and my buddy likes boobs! There is NOTHING in history to suggest that black people, women, Muslims, Hispanics, Asian people could have massively different perspectives based on their upbringing and culture, that a group of white men can't replicate."
Do you even listen to yourselves?
Seriously. I know you guys never leave the house, but you must have spoken to a black person or a woman at least once, right?
Do you listen to yourself? You're arguing that individuals within similar demographics are going to have the same perspectives. Presumably because you think there is something essential about those demographics that gear them all to the same perspective.
There is enough variation among individuals to lead people within similar demographics to radically different perspectives. You might not intend to, but you're communicating the idea that those demographics are monolithic.Wait so Oceans' 8 having poor reviews is responsible for sexism?Esrac posted...I think it depends on the personal experiences and dispositions of the individual men and women in the booths. The perspectives of the two white men could have significantly more variance than the perspectives of the man and woman.
Instead, let's put PZ Meyers in one booth with Alex Jones.
Then put Ivanka and Eric Trump in the other booth.
I'd wager the perspectives of Ivanka and Eric are a lot closer than PZ and Alex.
Yes, in that example, obviously there would be a greater difference in the two men. That said, your example is a little disingenuous, because the man and woman are brother and sister, but I get your point. Substitute Eric Trump for... say Rudy Giulani, or whatever.
The point of that exercise, which I admit is pretty rough, was to suggest that until you've engaged with people who come from very different places than you, whether it's gender or race, you don't really get how much different their life experiences are from you than someone from the same race/gender/etc. It took me a long time and a lot of frank conversations for a white boy who grew up in NH to understand how different those experiences could be, and for some folk to suggest "Nah, it's probably similar" given what I know of some of these people is, well...
Furthermore, if you look at the critic base of movies, they're not really broken down by region and socioeconomic position. They're largely liberal and focused around urban areas. So if you were to suggest, hey, rural conservatives are different from urban liberals, yeah, that's true, but let's be honest: how many conservative rural movie critics do you know?CyricZMaybe producers should actually have the balls to make an all new IP for a female team to make famous instead of putting them on the shoulders of men who already did all the hard work.
"[X title] but now it's all women because we're totally progressive guys!" Those movies will always suck and always be hated for good reasonCyricZ posted...
The point of that exercise, which I admit is pretty rough, was to suggest that until you've engaged with people who come from very different places than you, whether it's gender or race, you don't really get how much different their life experiences are from you
Unless they're white, in which case you can just assume their experiences are all the same. Right?Do good.
Eat communists.CyricZ posted...Furthermore, if you look at the critic base of movies, they're not really broken down by region and socioeconomic position.
It is illogical to assume that every type of work will be broken down into a perfect ratio of region, socioeconomic position, race, sex, favorite sexual position, favorite fetish, etc. This is a delusional expectation that doesn't match reality.
In the freest societies, you still don't get naturally forming quotas based on immutable characteristics.Do good.
Eat communists.FLUFFYGERM posted...CyricZ posted...
The point of that exercise, which I admit is pretty rough, was to suggest that until you've engaged with people who come from very different places than you, whether it's gender or race, you don't really get how much different their life experiences are from you
Unless they're white, in which case you can just assume their experiences are all the same. Right?
What makes his stupid argument even more hilarious is that he thinks a diverse group of critics would've rated the movie better even though that same diverse group all have different perspectives lol
Man sjw's are sadListen to my story... This... May be our last chance...CyricZ posted...The point of that exercise, which I admit is pretty rough, was to suggest that until you've engaged with people who come from very different places than you, whether it's gender or race, you don't really get how much different their life experiences are from you than someone from the same race/gender/etc.
I think I understand why we aren't on the same page here. We're not talking about different perspectives on social inequality, or economic policy, or real life situations here. We're talking about reviewing movies. You do not need to have deep life experiences or a rich cultural acumen to review movies, you just have to have watched a lot of movies.
Consider if the subject was video games; having come from a black, white, female, male, Asian, transgender or whatever background would have little impact on if you think the combat sucks or if the graphics were good, only the other games you've played would influence your opinion. Maybe the story would affect you on different ways depending on your relation to the main character, but just as in movies, the story isn't everything.
I think you're elevating film criticism beyond what it deserves.The folks who know about frostiness stay frostiest the most.FLUFFYGERM posted...It is illogical to assume that every type of work will be broken down into a perfect ratio
Proud, this is the only time I intend to address you in this topic.
For every other type of work I'd agree with you.
But not for criticism and evaluation of media and entertainment.
In that venue more than any other, I think it's essential we get as much of a breadth of perspectives as possible, because media and entertainment are a reflection of our own global culture and individual cultures. They re-imagine experiences and reproduce them for our own mental processing. They're based on the idea of getting to our emotional centers and figuring out what works to get us entertained. For that, I think it's worth going outside the lines a bit and while I'm not looking for a mathematical distribution, I think we can do better than 80% white urban liberal men.CyricZCyricZ posted...In that venue more than any other, I think it's essential we get as much of a breadth of perspectives as possible, because media and entertainment are a reflection of our own global culture and individual cultures. They re-imagine experiences and reproduce them for our own mental processing. They're based on the idea of getting to our emotional centers and figuring out what works to get us entertained.
You are literally still arguing that whites are not capable of having a breadth of perspectives, and that other races are inherently varied in their perspectives. That is racist and sexist. You haven't even given any specific examples of movie rating criteria and how race/gender matters.Do good.
Eat communists.16-BITTER posted...You do not need to have deep life experiences or a rich cultural acumen to review movies, you just have to have watched a lot of movies.
Maybe not how you describe it, but regardless, we are all part of the human experience, so you can't help but get people critiquing movies have had *some* life experience and apply those experiences to what and how they view. As I said earlier, "Get Out" in particular spoke to a large number of black Americans, and even struck some white Americans as to certain aspects of the black American experience the way that movies don't typically go.Consider if the subject was video games; having come from a black, white, female, male, Asian, transgender or whatever background would have little impact on if you think the combat sucks or if the graphics were good, only the other games you've played would influence your opinion. Maybe the story would affect you on different ways depending on your relation to the main character, but just as in movies, the story isn't everything.
The story is certainly a greater aspect in films than it is in video games, but even how that story is presented can have an effect. Cinematography and direction have their own contributions to the story in the way they're utilized.
16-BITTER posted...I think you're elevating film criticism beyond what it deserves.
Well, that's your opinion. All I know is that I've watched some pretty good critiques over the past decade or so that make me think and learn about movies with a lot more scrutiny as an adult than I did back in school.CyricZCyricZ posted...Esrac posted...
I think it depends on the personal experiences and dispositions of the individual men and women in the booths. The perspectives of the two white men could have significantly more variance than the perspectives of the man and woman.
Instead, let's put PZ Meyers in one booth with Alex Jones.
Then put Ivanka and Eric Trump in the other booth.
I'd wager the perspectives of Ivanka and Eric are a lot closer than PZ and Alex.
Yes, in that example, obviously there would be a greater difference in the two men. That said, your example is a little disingenuous, because the man and woman are brother and sister, but I get your point. Substitute Eric Trump for... say Rudy Giulani, or whatever.
The point of that exercise, which I admit is pretty rough, was to suggest that until you've engaged with people who come from very different places than you, whether it's gender or race, you don't really get how much different their life experiences are from you than someone from the same race/gender/etc. It took me a long time and a lot of frank conversations for a white boy who grew up in NH to understand how different those experiences could be, and for some folk to suggest "Nah, it's probably similar" given what I know of some of these people is, well...
Furthermore, if you look at the critic base of movies, they're not really broken down by region and socioeconomic position. They're largely liberal and focused around urban areas. So if you were to suggest, hey, rural conservatives are different from urban liberals, yeah, that's true, but let's be honest: how many conservative rural movie critics do you know?
I deliberately chose the Trump siblings because their siblings and likely had similar upbringings that would give them similar perspectives despite their differing sex. Compared to the other booth that has a far right conspiracy theorist and a far left atheist who are both white men. To emphasis that there are more important factors in determining perspective than race and gender.
Yes, there is a lot of overlap regarding movie critics being urban liberals. So, are you ready to go to bat for the fledgling rural conservative movie critic? Should we see a bigger push for the perspectives of poor, rural, conservative white males in movie criticism? Are they a less valuable perspective than, say, the urban, liberal, upper middle class asian woman? Compared to an urban, liberal, upper middle class white man?
What I'm trying to get at is they're clamoring for the perspectives of women or people of color as if those are the primary variables to influence perspectives. When, I think, you can still get remarkably different perspectives within the same racial and gender demographics by accounting for other factors. A white man who grew up poor in a trailer park in Mississippi is probably going to have a different perspective than a white man who grew up wealthy in New York. And that's just within the United States. Will a white man born and raised in Africa have the same perspective as a white man born and raised in Soviet Russia?
FLUFFYGERM posted...CyricZ posted...
The point of that exercise, which I admit is pretty rough, was to suggest that until you've engaged with people who come from very different places than you, whether it's gender or race, you don't really get how much different their life experiences are from you
Unless they're white, in which case you can just assume their experiences are all the same. Right?
Be fair to him. He at least acknowledges that there are differences between, say, urban liberal whites and rural conservative whites.Esrac posted...Be fair to him. He at least acknowledges that there are differences between, say, urban liberal whites and rural conservative whites.
I'm not convinced he does. He just wants brownie points for pretending to bash the liberal whites since he thinks we are that conservative that it matters to us that he's attacking white LIBERALS lolDo good.
Eat communists.Esrac posted...What I'm trying to get at is they're clamoring for the perspectives of women or people of color as if those are the primary variables to influence perspectives.
I'd argue, and have argued, that they're a greater aspect to focus on for diversity in the field.
But I can only cite my own experiences and those aforementioned frank conversations.CyricZFLUFFYGERM posted...Esrac posted...
Be fair to him. He at least acknowledges that there are differences between, say, urban liberal whites and rural conservative whites.
I'm not convinced he does. He just wants brownie points for pretending to bash the liberal whites since he thinks we are that conservative that it matters to us what their skin color is.
What brownie points? From who? He wasn't bashing liberal whites in that post. He isn't even pretending to.
If you think he is being dishonest with his posts, then why are you even trying to argue against his statements? There would clearly be no point to the dispute if you assume his statements are deliberately made in bad faith.CyricZ posted...Esrac posted...
What I'm trying to get at is they're clamoring for the perspectives of women or people of color as if those are the primary variables to influence perspectives.
I'd argue, and have argued, that they're a greater aspect to focus on for diversity in the field.
But I can only cite my own experiences and those aforementioned frank conversations.
Do you think poor blacks in Baltimore and upper middle class blacks in Brooklyn are going to have the same perspectives on the The Wire as they would The Cosby Show just because they're black?
I would doubt it. As a poor white guy in Louisiana, I wouldn't presume to have the same perspective as a rich white guy in California.- Boards
- Current Events
- Here we go again. Stars blame sexism on Ocean's 8 lukewarm reviews
No comments:
Post a Comment